kay1864
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2010
- Messages
- 1,488
I've always thought that if guests spend more time in standby lines, then they're more likely to need an extra day to see a park, which means extra ticket revenue, food revenue, merchandise revenue, possibly even resort revenue.
But as more guests use FP, standby time will decline (eventually).
OTOH, the more time guests spend in standby, that's time they don't have to shop, plus they're grumpier and thus maybe less likely to buy merchandise. More important, return visits would decrease if guests had an unhappy experience. But the ticket, food, and possibly resort revenue *for that visit* would still increase though, if the guest needs an extra day.
From a purely revenue standpoint, it seems like it would be in Disney's interest to increase standby time, not decrease it. Maybe they're looking for more return visits instead of guests needing an extra day or two for their trip.
Thoughts?
But as more guests use FP, standby time will decline (eventually).
OTOH, the more time guests spend in standby, that's time they don't have to shop, plus they're grumpier and thus maybe less likely to buy merchandise. More important, return visits would decrease if guests had an unhappy experience. But the ticket, food, and possibly resort revenue *for that visit* would still increase though, if the guest needs an extra day.
From a purely revenue standpoint, it seems like it would be in Disney's interest to increase standby time, not decrease it. Maybe they're looking for more return visits instead of guests needing an extra day or two for their trip.
Thoughts?
Bill
