We have been to WDW over 12 times the past 8 years. We LOVE WDW and always stay at the Poly, GF or YC. We are considering traveling to DL for our next vacation. I am concerned about missing DW and regreting the DL trip once we are there.
Has anyone ever traveled to DL after many trips to DW, if so please give me feedback.
Lots of interesting answers already here, some of which greatly surprised me. In any case, I do not fit your description of many trips to WDW before trying DLR. I am the opposite with first trip to WDW in 2006 after many to DLR. Before the WDW trip I spent lots of time on DIS, TGM, reading the UOG, etc., and picked up a lot of how WDW visitors think and what they expect. So I think I can offer some perspectives that may help you in your decision.
The comments about DLR being dirty with a less-than-desirable crowd was surprising to me. I found WDW to be more run down than DLR, but neither WDW nor DLR are in terrible shape IMO and thus to me this is not a big issue.
The type of behavior described by others in this thread regarding foul language, teenager inappropriate dress and behavior, I can not remember ever seeing at DLR. I have four children and my DW and I are very sensitive to such things.
I
did find the Cast Members at WDW overall to be more friendly that at DLR. On the other hand, I encountered
many misinformed CMs who gave me incorrect information at WDW. I quickly learned that if the information I sought was important to me, to double and triple-check the answers with different CMs because the first answer I received was likely to be incorrect.
My intent is not to flat out disagree with other posts, but to say that I do
not think they are fair overall representations of DLR (although I can accept they represent the posters' individual experiences when they were there). From reading some of the posts I was envisioning a dirty carnival-like atmosphere with gang members and raunchy teenage behavior. That is so far away from my experience at DLR it did not even seem like we were talking about the same place.
With all of that said, what I really wanted to say is something about expectations. WDW and DLR are different places with different strengths and weaknesses. DLR is not a WDW clone, and why would anyone want it to be? It has a different history and the experience is different. Someone who expects a WDW-like experience at DLR is going to be just as frustrated as someone who expects a DLR-like experience at WDW.
It is my observation that some Disney visitors get accustomed to how they experience their home Disney resort (e.g., WDW) and then conclude that that is the
only way to experience a Disney resort. Thus anything that fails to achieve their expected experience is viewed negatively.
I would suggest that there are different ways to experience Disney resorts and thus no one single
ideal way. Yes, many people who visit WDW like to be immersed for 8-10 days. And that becomes their ideal. DLR is more of 3-5 day resort. But why can't that be the ideal? Who says one is better than the other?
To turn the tables around, DLR vets like myself are accustomed to visiting Disney parks in nice weather without rain or humidity. When we visited WDW for 10 days (in mid-June) we got to experience a tropical storm for two days, and half our days it rained. Every day it was humid. If our ideal Disney visit was "nice weather" then we
might have concluded that "WDW is a terrible place - too much rain and humidity". Well, we were mentally prepared beforehand and did not let weather dampen our trip. But it might have if we had forced our DLR-type weather expectations on WDW.
So where does that leave you? In summary, I think WDW vets who love Disney and are willing to set aside their WDW-based expectations and be open to DLR differences (and even embrace DLR strengths - of which there are many IMO), and are willing to do a little research to be pre-informed of the DLR differences are likely to have a wonderful time at DLR. Why? Because DLR is just an awesome place.
FWIW, DLR is less than WDW and more than WDW. Here is the "more" side:
1. Rides
WDW's four parks only have 10% more rides than DLR's two parks. The DLR parks are more concentrated with rides, and many good ones at that. A Disney trip is more than just mere rides, but rides are big part IMO. What I found interesting is that we went on less rides at WDW over ten days than we did on our most recent four day trip to DLR. Why? Because the DLR parks are so accessible, it is easier to park hop at DLR, easier to make rope drop, easier to take afternoon breaks, and the weather is better in Southern California.
2. Shows
It is my opinion and that of many others that the shows at the DLR parks right now are better than the ones at WDW. IMO the Remember Dreams Come True fireworks/laser/special effects show at DLR is better than any show at WDW including Illuminations. Most (not all) people who have seen Fantasmic at DLR and WDW find Fantasmic at DLR to be better. The Aladdin show at DCA is better than any stage show that WDW had in 2006. I have not yet seen Nemo at AK and cannot compare it to that.
WDW has more shows than DLR (including shows outside the parks as you know) and I saw 13 shows at WDW over ten days as compared to seven shows on our most recent four day DLR trip mentioned above.
3. Weather
It rains 50 inches per year in Orlando and 10 inches per year in Anaheim. And there is no humidity to speak of in Anaheim. The weather at DLR is better overall than at WDW.
4. Proximity
With the hotels, parks and DTD being so close to each other it is easier to access the parks and more thoroughly experience the parks at DLR.
I have collected my thoughts into a lengthy thread that might help you answer your question - "A DLR Guide for WDW Vets"
www.disboards.com/showthread.php?t=1162599