maui2k5 said:
It would be kind of ironic in a way that Disney wants to promote their parks differently than they really are (or at least perceived). Is the Universal Pixie Dust commercial having any kind of an impact in Orlando on how Disney is perceived?
Well as someone who is involved in corporate advertising, I'd say that the parks may be mostly for children but advertising is geared towards the people who have to make the buying decision. So, the advertising has to be directed to the adults, parents, college students, who can make the decision to go to the parks on their own. The only way the company would likely directly promote to children is to try to have the children influence their parents to get them there. However, this is indirect and likely much less effective than promoting directly to the adults. Not to mention it also reaches those like myself (26 and married) who dont have kids and like the more adult side of Disney.
I dont think the Universal advertising works really "against" disney, but it DOES seperate them from disney. I think they want people to know they are different and on a more adult side of things.
I am sure there's even more to the reasoning for the classic look, but, Im sure alot of it has to do with maturity, the "Classic" appeal, in that it looks the same now as it did when I was a child, without too many people changing it.
While Disney is about Mickey Mouse, Im sure the company wants to convey more to prospective visitors than Mickey Mouse, and to the person who has never been to Disney, and is viewing the promotional material, Disney may feel that by them seeing a massive Mickey Hand on the "ball", that it looks a bit childish and may actually encourage visitors to go to Universal.
Though they only verbally jab on a very slight way, they are competitors in the heaviest business sense, but you'll never really see that since without the one, the other would never be as powerful in drawing as many people to Orlando as there currently are.