FlightlessDuck
Y kant Donald fly?
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2006
- Messages
- 21,804
I would like to see a version of each plan that's slightly less expensive and doesn't include the refillable mug my family doesn't use.
Yup my dh too!! I know we'll get there he'll see $9 for a burger and be all "I'm not hungry" when he really is, then he'll get a headache and be grumpy.The dining plans work better for us than OOP. Why? Because my husband, who isn't the world's greatest Disney fan anyway, gets enraged at the prices every time he has to pull out his wallet. He complains during the meals and ruins it for everybody. I've found it is much simpler to pay for the dining plan (or better yet go during Free Dining) and enjoy our meals in peace. Another type of plan might be a good thing. We never use all our snack credits anyway.
I agree with what Deb & Bill said early on. The purpose of the Dining plan is to make money, not to meet each and every possible wish of a guest.
I think most of these ideas are just unreasonable, from a business perspective.
Sorry, it is what it is.
The "What would Walt think about this?" argument doesn't fly. While WDW on opening day in 1971 may not have been exactly what Walt envisioned, having opened so soon (relatively) after his passing, it is fair to assume that WDW in 1971 was much closer to his intentions than what we have today. And I can tell you in no uncertain terms, the food today is 1000 times better than it was in 1972 when I first visited. You really couldn't do better than a "buffeteria" back then. There was no signature dining, and the Gulf Coast Room, Magnloia Room and Top of the World were the cream of the crop, and none of those could compare to what is offered today at the higher end. Granted, the food 15 years ago was far superior to today. But today is still a far cry better than pre-1984. By a wide margin.I am here for my fourth time on the DDP, and I can honestly say, never again. I have not had a decient meal yet. ...Do you think this is what Walt had in mind? I don't.
There is such an approach. It is called eating OOP. It won't cost you any more, and will afford you complete flexibility. As pointed out above, the current pricing of the DP can result, at best, in very modest savings. Those savings are then traded in for lack of flexibility. While one can debate costs and run comparison spreadsheets until the cows come home, there is one undeniable truth to all of this, and that is that paying OOP will always afford the greatest flexibility. If flexibility really matters to you, then your decision is an easy one. As others have pointed out, sometimes other factors supersede flexibility, such as "hiding" the prices from grumpy guests. If that is a paramount concern, then go with a DP.Personally, I think having a "select what you want" approach would be the best idea.
Actually, there is. See quote below.I also think there is no way for Disney to have a plan that would make everyone happy.
This. Total cost equals the same as the DP, so one cannot debate price. Diner gets to choose whatever s/he wants with total flexibility. Appetizers are back in play and one is not confined to two desserts and snacks everyday. The unused "credits" never expire. And if you run out of money because you spent more than you allocated and have to dip into additional OOP funding, it is easy to then perform a self-evalution of your plan vs. Disney's Plan. In other words, if you pay an extra $150 over the course of your vacation, you get the ability to evaluate instantly whether the flexibility was worth the extra cost. If so, you carry on in this fashion. If you find that the extra money was not worth it, then next time, you know to stick to the confines of the plan.We make our own dining plan. We take the amount Disney charges and put it on a prepaid debit card. That way, our dining is "prepaid" and we keep any "credits" we don't use on vacation.
Why would they do that? The pricing strategy of a plan such as this would be simple. The cost of 10 CS meals would be "10 x the average price of a CS meal". What would be the point of making it less than that? Disney is not interested in handing out "freebies", nor should it be. If a plan existed that provided 10 CS meals for the cost of 9, everyone would buy that plan and Disney would be giving away for free 10% of all CS meals served. And you know what would happen then? The average cost of a CS meal would increase 10% to reach break-even status. So in the end, people who are on long vacations who buy 10 CS meals end up paying the same amount as they would have before, and people on shorter vacations who cannot justify buying 10 CS credits would be paying 10% more for their meals. Nobody wins.Seems like it would work if you could buy bundles of what you want. Like say 10 QS and 5 sit down meals. Or 10 QS and 10 snacks. They could give a small incrimental savings for each bundle you buy.
The dining plans work better for us than OOP. We never use all our snack credits anyway.
We make our own dining plan. We take the amount Disney charges and put it on a prepaid debit card. That way, our dining is "prepaid" and we keep any "credits" we don't use on vacation.
The Deluxe Plan has 3 table service meals and one snack per night of your stay. No counter service meals at all.I personally wish they had a TS and snack only plan. I personally could care less about CS meals and lack of variety in dessert dept. doesn't help any. I am one who would like to do GC Dp but DH won't go for it.
I also would prefer something along lines of DL meal plan where you get coupons for so many snack, Cs, and TS meals but you could use your coupons in other ways if you wish. For example we had 5 day plan so we got 4 reg TS ( 32.00 value), 1 premier TS ( 40.00 value), 5 CS( 15.00 value) and 5 snacks ( 5.00 value) but we could use our CS ( 15.00 value) to pay for extras at TS meal ( we had a cake for BDAy). or if I wanted app with my meal I could throw in one of my snack vouchers to cover my App. I know you don't get change back so you either use full amount or "throw away" what you don't use but at least I have flexability and Dh has meals prepaid for most part.
Fire14 said:I personally wish they had a TS and snack only plan. I personally could care less about CS meals and lack of variety in dessert dept. doesn't help any. I am one who would like to do GC Dp but DH won't go for it.
I also would prefer something along lines of DL meal plan where you get coupons for so many snack, Cs, and TS meals but you could use your coupons in other ways if you wish. For example we had 5 day plan so we got 4 reg TS ( 32.00 value), 1 premier TS ( 40.00 value), 5 CS( 15.00 value) and 5 snacks ( 5.00 value) but we could use our CS ( 15.00 value) to pay for extras at TS meal ( we had a cake for BDAy). or if I wanted app with my meal I could throw in one of my snack vouchers to cover my App. I know you don't get change back so you either use full amount or "throw away" what you don't use but at least I have flexability and Dh has meals prepaid for most part.
JennaDeeDooDah said:The Deluxe Plan has 3 table service meals and one snack per night of your stay. No counter service meals at all.
Personally, I think the idea of them saying, "Okay, we are going to charge $X for each table service, $Y for each counter service, and $Z for each snack. Now you can choose how many of each you would like for your stay. Also, letting people choose between an app or a dessert would be so much better. The more I think about it, the more I think that this would be the best way to go. Also, just like with tickets, you can allow people to add to their meal plan, but not to take away.