I don't think it's the resort in general or rooms itself that bother people, it's a building that doesn't fit the theme of the surrounding area is shoehorned in. Disney previously prided itself on sight lines and immersive areas. This company had the King of Morroco's personal architect assist with the pavilion in Epcot and blended ToT's height and color in with the pavilion and does something like erect a modern structure behind a log cabin 40 years later. That's the issue I personally have with these changes. PVB IT's exterior is LL with a turtle painted on it rather than tree branches.
The original PVB plan included two towers with thatched roofs flanking the resort and a lazy river. If it wasn't budget cut into oblivion it would have been much more pleasing aesthetically for the resort and entire Seven Seas Lagoon.
View attachment 1022804
View attachment 1022802
I actually just commented on BLT the other day in a thread about future
DVC resorts. The structure takes away from the original A-Frame more than the North Garden Wing did. At the end of the day it all comes down to profit for Disney.
From a resort planning perspective, the hotels exist to service park access. That’s ultimately the value. There is a point where you reach critical mass and too much land is being used for hotels. Ambience of the overall resort begins to take a back seat and of course more hotel land means less that can go into park expansion or new gates. There’s also something to be said for “green space” between properties. There are parts of Disney now where that separation and the immersion is lost due to overcrowded sight lines from development. After a certain point, if they want to redevelop...