SookieStackhouse
"I'm Sookie Stackhouse, and I'm a waitress"
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2011
- Messages
- 1,628
I am definitely against declawing cats.
Perhaps you'd get more interest if you offered debarking instead. Pesky children too loud? Interrupting your endless line-up of trashy reality shows with their yelling? Why, simply have their voice boxes mangled and you and your babydaddy won't even hear them whine. After all, it's for their "comfort" and your piece of mind, since parenting is SO hard. It was the hardest three minutes of your life trying to teach them to be quiet, right?
![]()
I read through this thread and didn't see this, so my apologies if someone has brought it up and I just missed it.
There is an easy way to keep your cats from going some place or shredding furniture even if you're not around, and it doesn't involve vigilance on your part every minute of the day - double sided tape.
You can buy wide pieces of it at the pet stores, although you'll pay a premium for it, or you can just buy double sided rug tape. (Used to keep rugs from sliding around.) This tape won't hurt furniture - it's not that sticky and it doesn't leave residue.
Apply the tape where ever you don't want the cats to walk or to scratch. The moment paw meets sticky the cat will get a really disgusted look and stalk off.
Combine that with a carboard scratching pad (like this one) to give them a place that they CAN scratch and would like to scratch (sprinkling some nip into it helps!), and you shouldn't have problems with scratching inappropriately.
Cats with trimmed claws do not try to scratch at furniture nearly as much as untrimmed cats do. I would say that for about a week after I trim their nails, I seldom see them scratching at anything. But, at the two week mark, they start up again.
This may have been addressed but I sort of skipped around all the arguing and condescending posts and such:
I see what the internet says about declawing a cat so please no more links. I don't believe everything I read on the internet and would discuss it with the vet if I was to have this done. BUT, I was always under the assumption and was even told this by one shelter, that the reason shelters and vets prefer for the cats to not be declawed has nothing to do with the procedure but that the cat basically loses its ability to defend itself and the ability to climb if need be to get away from an attacker (barking dog, etc.).
For those of you that say your vet won't do it or the shelter made you agree not to, did you ask why or are you just assuming its because of what you have found on the internet?
I also wanted to add that I find it interesting that some of you will sit here and call people barbaric for doing this and I am guessing that if the discussion was about cutting a dogs tail or their ears (like a Doberman has done) you would find that barbaric too; but some of you are the same posters that will debate to the death that abortion is acceptable. Not trying to debate it. Just thought it interesting.
That is one of the most ridiculous statements I have ever seen. You are actually try to claim that amputating your cats feet is better than taking the time and effort to train them because they might be told no and sprayed? Holy cowYou have absolutely NO idea your cat is not suffering as a result of what you did. Just because they can walk doesn't mean you didn't maim them..doesn't mean they are not in pain..it's not like they can tell you or will be visible in a limp. Cut off the tips of all your toes and learn to walk around again..sure you could probably do it but it doesn't mean it will feel good and you will not suffer lasting problems or pain as a result..that is what declawing does to a cat. Your cat simply adapted to amputation..that is hardly better than some training and discipline.