Credit Crunch Affects Disney's Timeshare Division

I like my DVC, I have no complaints. I am not too affected by the change...I am speaking from a business perspective. Most posters hear have no idea what financial positions Disney holds, nor losses or gains they have had. They don't look past how it has affected "them". Those that don't get totally educated on alot of the financial aspects, will just keep making blatant statements. I am only speaking from the other side....:cool2:

Okay. Still not sure why I was called a kool-aid drinking sycophant, though, nor the relevance to TWDC's declining earnings. :confused3
 
I don't know about DVC's actual bottom line or drinking kool aid or whatever. But I'm getting the feeling that Disney's cash cow might be strolling backstage. She hasn't left the building, but she might be behind the curtain for a while.

DisFlan
 
I hate to say it folks, but in my opinion the "dry credit markets" arent dry, they are simply back to normal and the way they should be. There was once a day when people had to do things like make down payments, establish credit, provide income verification, etc. Those things all fell by the wayside when the investment banks developed an appetite to securitize everything from mortgages and car loans to yes, loans for timeshares. They couldnt keep up with demand for these securities and the fat fees that came along with them, so they began using loans made to people with less and less ability to repay them. For those who financed through Disney, think about how easy the process was. The only thing they used to determine eligibility was your social security number. No questions about income or anything, just a number and a signiture. My guess is people who bought Disney's mortgage securities have been seeing quite a bit of loss from forclosure, etc.

My thinking is this is a double edged sword for Disney. If they are now forced to actually hold the mortgages, then they may actually have to be more selective on who they finance, which may also slow sales. I agree with the thinking as well that rather than use these dollars to ROFR boarderline deals, they will opt to let them pass in lieu of new sales at higher prices.
 
I hate to say it folks, but in my opinion the "dry credit markets" arent dry, they are simply back to normal and the way they should be. There was once a day when people had to do things like make down payments, establish credit, provide income verification, etc. Those things all fell by the wayside when the investment banks developed an appetite to securitize everything from mortgages and car loans to yes, loans for timeshares. They couldnt keep up with demand for these securities and the fat fees that came along with them, so they began using loans made to people with less and less ability to repay them. For those who financed through Disney, think about how easy the process was. The only thing they used to determine eligibility was your social security number. No questions about income or anything, just a number and a signiture. My guess is people who bought Disney's mortgage securities have been seeing quite a bit of loss from forclosure, etc.

My thinking is this is a double edged sword for Disney. If they are now forced to actually hold the mortgages, then they may actually have to be more selective on who they finance, which may also slow sales. I agree with the thinking as well that rather than use these dollars to ROFR boarderline deals, they will opt to let them pass in lieu of new sales at higher prices.


I can guarantee the credit markets are not dry. I agree it is just working the way it should. Those with good credit and an ability to repay what they borrow will still be able to finance anything they want. Those that cant afford to pay will have to live within their means. I cant believe how many people I know that make 1/2 of what my husband and I make that drive better cars, live in a bigger home, have all the latest & greatest technology in their homes. These are the same people that are losing those homes and having those fancy cars repo'd.

We dont buy what we cant afford. But you can count us in that 75% who financed through Disney. It was just easier to do it that way. And probably like many more of the 75% will have it paid off ASAP. Our loan will be paid in full by the 6 month mark.
 

I apologize if this has already been discussed, or if I'm unaware of recent news, but this passage in the article piqued my interest -

"Disney plans to open three new time-share properties in Orlando this year and one in Anaheim, Calif. It is also pressing ahead with plans for 830-room resort in Hawaii, in which 480 units are to be Vacation Club villas. Construction on that resort, which is to open in 2011, began in January."

Are the 3 "new" Orlando properties they are mentioning BLT, THV, and AKV?
 
What is truly scary about all of this is the coming wave that is inevitable IMO. If 75% of purchases are financed .. there will only be an increased number of foreclosures as time goes on. What happens with these timeshare interests? Even if DIsney doesnt own many of them, someone has this toxic paper on their books and will ultimately have to unload it (thereby dragging prices down and inventory up!).

None of us really have the data .. but you would think things like timeshare purchases would be among the first things to go when having to decide on priorities of things to cut from the budget.

There is a light at the end of the tunnel .. but I am of the belief that it will get much worse before it gets better .. mostly because of the "perfect storm" that has been brewing - credit availability, continuing job losses, consumer confidence in the toilet .. its bad out there folks!!
 
What is truly scary about all of this is the coming wave that is inevitable IMO. If 75% of purchases are financed .. there will only be an increased number of foreclosures as time goes on. What happens with these timeshare interests? Even if DIsney doesnt own many of them, someone has this toxic paper on their books and will ultimately have to unload it (thereby dragging prices down and inventory up!).

Foreclosures go up for public auction with a starting bid equal to the outstanding debt plus any outstanding legal fees. If there is no bid, ownership would revert to DVC or the owner of the note (not sure exactly how those relationships are structured with the securitization.)

But the DVC points still represent an asset. If they go back to DVC, DVC can re-sell them.

In some cases there may be money lost. But with DVC requiring a 10% downpayment and interest payments heavy in the early years of the loan, I think that volume would be low.

Look at a 160-pt contract at AKV purchased 18 months ago. DVC would have received about $1000 up front and $2000+ in interest payments. If they foreclose, DVC can then re-sell the same points for $112. No great loss there. :teacher:

TTS has less than 75,000 DVC points worth of contracts for sale now on their website. That's about one week's worth of "new" sales for DVC. It would take a pretty catastrophic drop in sales / increase in resales in order for DVC to feel any sort of pinch from it. Our economy is certainly suffering and may still get worse, but folks are still buying into DVC and putting tens-of-thousands in the theme parks on a daily basis. Things certainly aren't as rosy as they were a year ago, but something tells me Disney isn't on the verge of hanging a "going out of business" sign, either. :goodvibes
 
One thing that makes a big difference for DVC value is when you compare what it costs to rent a deluxe room at a Walt Disney World resort hotel. We just added on at SSR and I did it because I know owning DVC gives me a discount compared to paying cash for a deluxe Disney hotel room. If I try to book a room at the Beach Club, it's going to be upwards of $300 a night after tax (even with a discount). 13 points a night Sunday through Thursday during the season I go feels like I'm stealing it - laughter.
 
Foreclosures go up for public auction with a starting bid equal to the outstanding debt plus any outstanding legal fees. If there is no bid, ownership would revert to DVC or the owner of the note (not sure exactly how those relationships are structured with the securitization.)

If Disney holds the note, then the asset just reverts back into their inventory which they can sale. But what if someone else holds the asset. Then they may want to unload it cheaply to cut thier losses. Then Disney has to either spend to pick it up with ROFR or let is sell at a lower price.

Often times banks or mortgage companies set bids at the outstanding debt, only to unload property at a loss later on. And that does not even include what other property they take losses on with short sales.
 
A CNNMoney article from 2/12 says that, according to Fitch Ratings, defaults on timeshare loans were at an all time high in December. (Starwood, Wyndham, Marriott, Westgate etc. Disney wasn't specifically mentioned). And because of lower sales in general, lower numbers of new loans are being sought - or approved because of the tight credit market.

Most of the major timeshare companies are actively shrinking their businesses right now to cut costs - layoffs, offering less credit and scaling back on expansions. I'm crossing my fingers for DVC. If their pockets are deep enough, if they can continue to generate enough sales (and a high enough percentage of mortgages remain viable), this may end up being an opportunity for Disney in the long run.

DisFlan
 
If Disney holds the note??? I think you are missing the point of the article mentioned by the OP. Disney sold bundles of the mortgages and therefore no longer holds the note. If 75% of DVC buyers were carrying a mortgage on DVC, then you can believe that there will be a large number of defaults on both the mortgage and mf payments. It will take time for those points to work their way back to DVC. In the interim, the total charge of mf will be shared by a dwindling base - expect sizeable increases next year, and possibly for some time to come - a problem that will not be unique to DVC.
 
If Disney holds the note??? I think you are missing the point of the article mentioned by the OP. Disney sold bundles of the mortgages and therefore no longer holds the note. If 75% of DVC buyers were carrying a mortgage on DVC, then you can believe that there will be a large number of defaults on both the mortgage and mf payments. It will take time for those points to work their way back to DVC. In the interim, the total charge of mf will be shared by a dwindling base - expect sizeable increases next year, and possibly for some time to come - a problem that will not be unique to DVC.

I'm not saying the mf won't go up, but isn't there a limit on how much it can increase per year? Or is any amount needed that's more than the collected fees split among owners of a particular resort? (Like VB after a hurricane?) If that's how it works, and fees become too high in general, I could see this as a problem for both current owners and future sales. If it happens.


DisFlan
 
If 75% of DVC buyers were carrying a mortgage on DVC, then you can believe that there will be a large number of defaults on both the mortgage and mf payments.

It would help to know what sort of numbers that 75% translates into. It is certainly not saying that 75% of current members are financed. With DVC offering a max 10-year mortgage, only people who bought from 2000 forward would still be financed.

And we have no idea what trends those buyers have followed with their loans. Many people talk about financing thru Disney and then rolling the debt over to a home equity line, low interest credit card offer or other financing vehicle. DVC offers 1-year loans. And even those who financed for 10 years can pay off the loan early--our first DVC purchase was partially financed and paid off quite early.

So how many contracts are financed at any given moment in time? Who knows. :confused3

At risk of drinking too much kool-aid again, the US unemployment rate has risen 3% in the last year. While that's a frightening figure in and of itself, it also means that 93% of our nation is still gainfully employed. Most people continue to make on-time payments for their homes, cars and even timeshares. Things may well get worse before they get better, but it seems a little reckless (or at least vague) to start predicting "a large number of defaults" on DVC mortgages.

As for the impact on annual dues, I don't see how that could come into play. The basis for dues calculations are the number of points in circulation--not the number of people actually paying their dues. When defaults occur, the outstanding dues payments get lumped in with the debt owed by the points-holder...and that debt does not go away. If DVD repossesses the points, DVD pays the dues. If another note holder reclaims the points, they are responsible for the dues until they are able to re-sell the contract.

If foreclosures have any impact on dues it may come in the form of lower interest revenue. Interest rates are low to begin with and slower payments means less ability to generate that revenue. Of course that's a pretty low-benefit budget item to begin with--along the lines of a penny or two per point.
 
You are misinformed about unemployment statistics when you state that 93% of the population is gainfully employed. Unemployment rates demonstrate the "current" percentage of the population that are unemployed and actively seeking employment during the past 4 weeks. People who have given up or taken part-time or lesser positions are no longer included in the statistic but are far from gainfully employed. The actual unemployment number is much, much higher than what is reported.

Dues collection are based upon the points in circulation but require payment. Should the original DVC member go into default and file for bankruptcy, those dues will not be paid. However, the underlying bills to DVC must be paid therefore resulting in higher dues the following year. Yes the majority of people continue to meet their obligations but insolvency is reaching an all time high and will continue to escalate at unheard of rates for the forseeable future.

If and when DVC obtains defaulted points, they will not obsorb the missing dues, rather it will and has been passed on to current members through their dues.
 
You are misinformed about unemployment statistics when you state that 93% of the population is gainfully employed. Unemployment rates demonstrate the "current" percentage of the population that are unemployed and actively seeking employment during the past 4 weeks. People who have given up or taken part-time or lesser positions are no longer included in the statistic but are far from gainfully employed. The actual unemployment number is much, much higher than what is reported.

I wouldn't say I was misinformed so much as I simply misspoke. I understand that only certain groups are counted in the statistics. However, doesn't it stand to reason that someone would be actively seeking employment if they had payments due on a Disney timeshare?

Just because people are forced to take part-time or lesser positions does not mean they are headed for default on their debts. I have a relative who works in an automotive-related field who has been in-and-out of work (mostly out) for the last 6 months. But they continue to make payments on their debts.

Dues collection are based upon the points in circulation but require payment. Should the original DVC member go into default and file for bankruptcy, those dues will not be paid. However, the underlying bills to DVC must be paid therefore resulting in higher dues the following year. Yes the majority of people continue to meet their obligations but insolvency is reaching an all time high and will continue to escalate at unheard of rates for the forseeable future.

If and when DVC obtains defaulted points, they will not obsorb the missing dues, rather it will and has been passed on to current members through their dues.

Well, the dues statements do include a disclaimer stating that the figures cited within represent the full annual obligation for each member. So technically DVC does not have the power to back-bill members for others' unpaid debts.

From a practical standpoint, they may be able to find...ahem...creative ways to defer expenses or reserve contributions and increase the amounts charged to members in subsequent years. I don't know how rigidly DVC's books are scrutinized to comment on that.

DVC can also respond to lower revenue by reducing resort overhead.

Still, I don't see justification for some of the more inflammatory comments here. According to one report I read, 2008 bankruptcy filings were around 1.2 million, up 30% from 2007. And another increase of 15-20% was projected for 2009. Those certainly aren't signs of a healthy economy--but they also don't give me reason to believe that my dues will be rising 15% next year to compensate for members who defaulted on their loans.

DVC has been dealing with defaults and delinquencies for 18 years now. While a 50% increase over a two year period is not a best case scenario, I'm not convinced that the sky is falling, either.

You seem to have a great deal of knowledge on this topic but I'm left scratching my head over comments like "a large number of defaults" and "sizeable [dues] increases." I'd love to hear more but specifics (even if speculative) would be appreciated.

I did a search of the Orange County Comptroller's website and was able to find 261 judgments to foreclose on DVC in 2008. That's a tiny percentage of the 140k owners in the program and I don't see most of us being impacted by a 20% increase in 2009.
 
The current unemployment numbers are WAY off. There are a lot of us who have fallen thru the crack now. I have been laid off for just almost 1 year and my unemployment has run out. How do I get counted now? I don't think I do any more. :sad2: Same thing with my Mom...she is also out of work and her unemployment ran out some time ago as well. We have both fallen thru the crack and are no longer even counted in the unemployment numbers. I also look for PT work or "lesser jobs" but there aren't even many of those to look for. Of course I look online at all of the regular job boards...but I also look thru my little local up-county Gazette paper every week. 7 or 8 months ago even it still used to have a whole Classified Section. NOW, that entire section is gone!! The Help Wanted ads that used to be several pages now fit onto 1 page and it's mostly stuff like "Telephone - Work At Home" or "Drivers Needed" stuff. It is sad. ANYWAY, as long as the Ramen Noodle plant doesn't turn up as having the next salmonela outbreak I think we'll make it. It is another reason I'm glad we didn't finance thru Disney as I would feel obligated to sell our DVC if we had that high interest rate hanging over us.
 
I apologize if this has already been discussed, or if I'm unaware of recent news, but this passage in the article piqued my interest -

"Disney plans to open three new time-share properties in Orlando this year and one in Anaheim, Calif. It is also pressing ahead with plans for 830-room resort in Hawaii, in which 480 units are to be Vacation Club villas. Construction on that resort, which is to open in 2011, began in January."

Are the 3 "new" Orlando properties they are mentioning BLT, THV, and AKV?
I too was wondering the same thing. Technically they are all still under construction so they could be "new."
 
Hi,

I was reading through the thread and figured I should post a quick reply to the question about the resorts. Yes, the three Orlando properties referenced are Bay Lake Tower, Treehouse Villas and Kidani Village.

Hope that helps,
Jason Garcia
 















New Posts





DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest

Back
Top