What kind of changes? Could it be related to more villas being declared into the condo association, altering the amount and percentage of income from Disney's villa rentals that have to be accounted for as income to the condo association vs. direct income to Disney?
Their breakage income went from 0.1771 per point to 0.0248 in one year. Per the math provided by the link, it is a change of -86%, which seems very large.
What kind of changes? Could it be related to more villas being declared into the condo association, altering the amount and percentage of income from Disney's villa rentals that have to be accounted for as income to the condo association vs. direct income to Disney?
Their breakage income went from 0.1771 per point to 0.0248 in one year. Per the math provided by the link, it is a change of -86%, which seems very large.
Yes, it's a calculation involving the actual number of $ taken in vs. the total of operating costs. Both of those have changed in the last year, right? I have no idea how to do that calculation but I'm pretty sure it's a moving number when a resort is in active sales and the number of villas (and even the sizes, e.g. a studio brings in less money than a 2BR) that Disney gets to rent is changing.
Edit to correct amount of revenue from studio relative to 2BR.
One thing that is incorrectly displayed (although accurate) is the management fee.
The fee goes up but thats because its essentially a almost fixed percentage of the total fees. So it really needs to be shown as change relative to the fee % for the year.
One thing that is incorrectly displayed (although accurate) is the management fee.
The fee goes up but thats because its essentially a almost fixed percentage of the total fees. So it really needs to be shown as change relative to the fee % for the year.