UrsulasShadow
<marquee><img src=http://photopost.wdwinfo.com/dat
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2005
- Messages
- 8,457
I know that this was meant for the students to learn something, but it really taught me something as well.
Especially with the second class, I could see many of them were getting frustrated with it, and I think it was Frank who said, "this is stupid". The funny thing is, when I look at it through an outsider's or newbie's eyes, it really is a pretty ineffectual way of communicating information and ideas. I liken it to stirring endlessly through the chowder just to get a few nuggets of clam. It just isn't an effective way to communicate between large numbers of people.
However, in our case, I see it not as a tool for communication, but more a tool for socialization. What I do see is that the more familiar we are to the group, the more likely that our particular communications will be noticed and responded to. It actually tends to reinforce our particular social hierarchy. No matter how hard we try to be welcoming and fair, people that are new to the chat group tend to get overlooked much more than oh, say, Kevin. It's just that you need to put filters on what you view and respond to, in order to get anything at all out of chat. And just about everyone has Kevin in their filter.
If you come into this with no filter settings at all, it looks just like gibberish. I noticed some of the students developing filters very rapidly, responding primarily to their own social group, and many of them pretty much giving up trying to figure out what those outside of their group were trying to ask and say.
I'm not sure what lessons the students came away with, other than "chat is stupid".
Especially with the second class, I could see many of them were getting frustrated with it, and I think it was Frank who said, "this is stupid". The funny thing is, when I look at it through an outsider's or newbie's eyes, it really is a pretty ineffectual way of communicating information and ideas. I liken it to stirring endlessly through the chowder just to get a few nuggets of clam. It just isn't an effective way to communicate between large numbers of people.
However, in our case, I see it not as a tool for communication, but more a tool for socialization. What I do see is that the more familiar we are to the group, the more likely that our particular communications will be noticed and responded to. It actually tends to reinforce our particular social hierarchy. No matter how hard we try to be welcoming and fair, people that are new to the chat group tend to get overlooked much more than oh, say, Kevin. It's just that you need to put filters on what you view and respond to, in order to get anything at all out of chat. And just about everyone has Kevin in their filter.
If you come into this with no filter settings at all, it looks just like gibberish. I noticed some of the students developing filters very rapidly, responding primarily to their own social group, and many of them pretty much giving up trying to figure out what those outside of their group were trying to ask and say.
I'm not sure what lessons the students came away with, other than "chat is stupid".