Chertoff says Katrina Scenario Did Not Exist

Status
Not open for further replies.

luvthatduke

It's not a vacation unless it's a road trip.
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
2,953
I pretty much don't know what to say after reading this:


From CNN.com:

Chertoff: Katrina scenario did not exist
However, experts for years had warned of threat to New Orleans
Saturday, September 3, 2005; Posted: 7:21 p.m. EDT (23:21 GMT)

Defending the U.S. government's response to Hurricane Katrina, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff argued Saturday that government planners did not predict such a disaster ever could occur.

But in fact, government officials, scientists and journalists have warned of such a scenario for years.

Chertoff, fielding questions from reporters, said government officials did not expect both a powerful hurricane and a breach of levees that would flood the city of New Orleans.

"That 'perfect storm' of a combination of catastrophes exceeded the foresight of the planners, and maybe anybody's foresight," Chertoff said.

He called the disaster "breathtaking in its surprise."

But engineers say the levees preventing this below-sea-level city from being turned into a swamp were built to withstand only Category 3 hurricanes. And officials have warned for years that a Category 4 could cause the levees to fail.

Katrina was a Category 4 hurricane when it struck the Gulf Coast on September 29.

Last week, Michael Brown, head of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, told CNN his agency had recently planned for a Category 5 hurricane hitting New Orleans.

Speaking to "Larry King Live" on August 31, in the wake of Katrina, Brown said, "That Category 4 hurricane caused the same kind of damage that we anticipated. So we planned for it two years ago. Last year, we exercised it. And unfortunately this year, we're implementing it."

Brown suggested FEMA -- part of the Department of Homeland Security -- was carrying out a prepared plan, rather than having to suddenly create a new one.

Chertoff argued that authorities actually had assumed that "there would be overflow from the levee, maybe a small break in the levee. The collapse of a significant portion of the levee leading to the very fast flooding of the city was not envisioned."


He added: "There will be plenty of time to go back and say we should hypothesize evermore apocalyptic combinations of catastrophes. Be that as it may, I'm telling you this is what the planners had in front of them. They were confronted with a second wave that they did not have built into the plan, but using the tools they had, we have to move forward and adapt."

But New Orleans, state and federal officials have long painted a very different picture.

"We certainly understood the potential impact of a Category 4 or 5 hurricane" on New Orleans, Lt. General Carl Strock, chief of engineers for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, said Thursday, Cox News Service reported.

Reuters reported that in 2004, more than 40 state, local and volunteer organizations practiced a scenario in which a massive hurricane struck and levees were breached, allowing water to flood New Orleans. Under the simulation, called "Hurricane Pam," the officials "had to deal with an imaginary storm that destroyed more than half a million buildings in New Orleans and forced the evacuation of a million residents," the Reuters report said.

In 2002 the New Orleans Times-Picayune ran a five-part series exploring the vulnerability of the city. The newspaper, and other news media as well, specifically addressed the possibility of massive floods drowning residents, destroying homes and releasing toxic chemicals throughout the city. (Read: "Times-Picayune" Special Report: Washing away)

Scientists long have discussed this possibility as a sort of doomsday scenario.

On Sunday, a day before Hurricane Katrina made landfall, Ivor van Heerden, director of the Louisiana State University Public Health Research Center in Baton Rouge, said, "This is what we've been saying has been going to happen for years."

"Unfortunately, it's coming true," he said, adding that New Orleans "is definitely going to flood."

Also on Sunday, Placquemines Parish Sheriff Jeff Hingle referred back to Hurricane Betsy -- a Category 2 hurricane that struck in 1965 -- and said, "After Betsy these levees were designed for a Category 3."

He added, "These levees will not hold the water back."

But Chertoff seemed unaware of all the warnings.

"This is really one which I think was breathtaking in its surprise," Chertoff said. "There has been, over the last few years, some specific planning for the possibility of a significant hurricane in New Orleans with a lot of rainfall, with water rising the levees and water overflowing the levees," he told reporters Saturday.

That alone would be "a very catastrophic scenario," Chertoff said. "And although the planning was not complete, a lot of work had been done. But there were two problems here. First of all, it's as if someone took that plan and dropped an atomic bomb simply to make it more difficult. We didn't merely have the overflow, we actually had the break in the wall. And I will tell you that, really, that perfect storm of combination of catastrophes exceeded the foresight of the planners, and maybe anybody's foresight."

Chertoff also argued that authorities did not have much notice that the storm would be so powerful and could make a direct hit on New Orleans.

"It wasn't until comparatively late, shortly before -- a day, maybe a day and a half, before landfall -- that it became clear that this was going to be a Category 4 or 5 hurricane headed for the New Orleans area."

As far back as Friday, August 26, the National Hurricane Center was predicting the storm could be a Category 4 hurricane at landfall, with New Orleans directly in its path. Still, storms do change paths, so the possibility existed that it might not hit the city.

But the National Weather Service prediction proved almost perfect.

Katrina made landfall on Monday, August 29.

Tens of thousands of people in New Orleans who did not or could not heed the mandatory evacuation orders issued the day before the storm made landfall were left in dire straits.

"I think we have discovered over the last few days that with all the tremendous effort using the existing resources and the traditional frameworks of the National Guard, the unusual set of challenges of conducting a massive evacuation in the context of still dangerous flood requires us to basically break the traditional model and create a new model -- one for what you might call kind of an ultracatastrophe," Chertoff said.

He vowed that the United States "is going to move heaven and earth" to rescue those in need.

edited to correct copy errors
 
I think that's a pathetic excuse!!!
 
No. If true, it would have been a very valid excuses. The problem is that it isn't true.
 
It's very odd to me that he expressed surprise at what happened; I'm just a private citizen who lives across the country and I read days before the hurricane about the "nightmare scenario" - the possibility of floods, etc. I've never been to NO, but I have known for years about how delicate the area was.

Maybe they should offer me a job? ;)

N.E.D.
 

It's not only that regular folks like you and I have heard of these scenarios being discussed for years, but also that it has been discussed all week, complete with links online to reports issues years ago. It's one thing to say something didn't happen when a bunch of people are scratching their heads thinking they remember it happening -- it is quite another thing to say something didn't happen when there is mounds of documentary evidence, including the Federal Record, being regularly discussed in the media.

I think the unwarranted criticism of Homeland Security this week has taken its toll on Chertoff. I don't think he's thinking clearly now.
 
When heads start to roll, I want to see his go first. What a poor excuse for a human being! :mad:
 
Is this kind of like when your kids are little and they cover their eyes and think that makes them invisible?

I saw shows about this scenario years and years ago. I think it was a national geographic show on hurricanes, and this was supposed to be one of the worst scenarios.

NG did an article in Oct of 2004 which sounds like it came straight out of a current news report: http://www3.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/0410/feature5/index.html

The news channels ALL DAY on Sunday were showing interviews with Dan Craig, who gave the scenario of what would happen, complete with the water taking 6 months to drain, etc.
 
bgirldeb said:
Is this kind of like when your kids are little and they cover their eyes and think that makes them invisible?

That has to be the most profound summary of this situation, and the larger issues it is a symptom of, than I think anyone can ever come up with.

Congrats. ;)

N.E.D.
 
bgirldeb said:
Is this kind of like when your kids are little and they cover their eyes and think that makes them invisible?
::yes::
And apparently, since their eyes are covered, they haven't been able to see they things that people all over the country were seeing before the storm. (Or maybe they were all on vacation).
 
bicker said:
No. If true, it would have been a very valid excuses. The problem is that it isn't true.

No, it's not true at all. And we're all learning and hearing more about that every day. The head of FEMA and Chertoff will be gone...and soon.

However, local officials knew that this was coming as well. This isn't just a Federal issue. Local and state officials are the first responders. It is their job to do everything that they can to get the word out and get the people out. That didn't happen. When they knew that they'd have thousands upon thousands at the Superdome and Convention center they had no food or water there for them, and no police there to keep the order.

Couple all of that with the very poor response by FEMA and we have the disaster that we're seeing....
 
When my husband was an undergrad in civil engineering at the University of Texas one of his classes did a case study on New Orleans involving a hurricane breaching the levees and flooding the city. That was nearly 20 years ago.

There is no excuse for the city to not have a better plan for evacuation and there is no excuse for our government's slow response. So many people droppedthe ball on this one it is unthinkable.
 
If anyone would read the Times-Picayune series on NO you would find that 'they'(the locals including Army Corps of E) wanted to develop a plan based on a Cat-4/5 hurricane except the funding was cut by Fed level as not necessary. In the newspaper report and it has been quoted many times on these Katrina threads, their is ample evidence that 'someone' wanted to do something to better prepare and protect NO but monies for the plan were diverted to ???(use your own guess).
 
I was just watching a TV news show and a weather expert and NOLA levee/water expert were on. They stated that

1) The actual winds that hit NOLA were of a Cat 2 Hurricane strength.

2) If the levees could really have held for a cat 3 they should not have failed or been breeched.

3) They think the levees may not have been breeched but failed.

4) NOLA has sunk 3 inches due to the levees keeping the water away.

This was known and was sadly a tragedy waiting to happen.
 
Virgo10 said:
When heads start to roll, I want to see his go first. What a poor excuse for a human being! :mad:

Not first, I want the head of FEMA to be first and him to be on his heels.
 
mickeyfan2 said:
I was just watching a TV news show and a weather expert and NOLA levee/water expert were on. They stated that

1) The actual winds that hit NOLA were of a Cat 2 Hurricane strength.

2) If the levees could really have held for a cat 3 they should not have failed or been breeched.

3) They think the levees may not have been breeched but failed.

4) NOLA has sunk 3 inches due to the levees keeping the water away.

This was known and was sadly a tragedy waiting to happen.


Very interesting and good point. The cat 4 winds were near the eyewall and the eyewall missed.

Sadly--"they" (generic) will want to find some"one" and not just some"thing". Levees failing for a Cat 2 is unacceptable. (not that faily for a Cat 5 would have been acceptable--just that the levees did not meet the challenge they were designed for).

By failed--as in they were never going to work and broke?
 
Just wanted to add--the levees failing are not the problem in this disaster--

The humanitarian effort is the biggest failure.

They knew stuff would hit the fan---and what they had to do when it did--didn't go as smoothly as it should have.
 
Lisa loves Pooh said:
Very interesting and good point. The cat 4 winds were near the eyewall and the eyewall missed.

Sadly--"they" (generic) will want to find some"one" and not just some"thing". Levees failing for a Cat 2 is unacceptable. (not that faily for a Cat 5 would have been acceptable--just that the levees did not meet the challenge they were designed for).

By failed--as in they were never going to work and broke?

Part of the article that someone else mentioned in this thread...the five part series in the Picauyne-Times, said that the levees were supposed to handle Cat 3, but in reality, the damage from Cat 1 hurricanes in the NO area was much more severe then it should have been.....due to the city sinking. They all knew it was coming.....
 
Lisa loves Pooh said:
By failed--as in they were never going to work and broke?

Failed in they broke at the base from the inside not the outside as they would in a breech. The water came in the bottom not the top. Does that make sence?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

New Posts


Disney Vacation Planning. Free. Done for You.
Our Authorized Disney Vacation Planners are here to provide personalized, expert advice, answer every question, and uncover the best discounts. Let Dreams Unlimited Travel take care of all the details, so you can sit back, relax, and enjoy a stress-free vacation.
Start Your Disney Vacation
Disney EarMarked Producer






DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter

Add as a preferred source on Google

Back
Top Bottom