raidermatt
Be water, my friend.
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2000
- Messages
- 6,856
Actually, finding a way to make education entertaining was considered quite a creative challenge for Epcot. True, DISNEY had never used live animals as entertainment in their parks, but others had. NOBODY had used education as the basis for a successful theme park on the scale of Epcot.
With the animals, they simply had to find the right already existing resources. There were no existing resources to tell them how to make education entertaining to the masses. In fact, many said it couldn't be done.
Further, that lack of experience with live animals still doesn't explain the lack of attractions when the park opened, and certainly not now, when the park isn't even increasing its animal exhibits anyway. The fact that the park has the number of attractions it does was and is a stategic choice in line with the way other Disney parks are now being built.
Support that strategy if you wish (I'll disagree, but that's another point), but you can't say it doesn't exist.
With the animals, they simply had to find the right already existing resources. There were no existing resources to tell them how to make education entertaining to the masses. In fact, many said it couldn't be done.
Further, that lack of experience with live animals still doesn't explain the lack of attractions when the park opened, and certainly not now, when the park isn't even increasing its animal exhibits anyway. The fact that the park has the number of attractions it does was and is a stategic choice in line with the way other Disney parks are now being built.
Support that strategy if you wish (I'll disagree, but that's another point), but you can't say it doesn't exist.