calorie intake????

njcarita

DIS Veteran
Joined
Jul 30, 2003
Messages
2,150
i've dieted so many times in the last few years u should know this answer. :rotfl2:

i want to start a low calorie/ low fat diet again :rolleyes1

what is a good calorie intake per day

here are my stats
1)40 ( hate exercize)
2)174 lbs and 5'9"

is there a calculation or web site that will lmk

thanks
 
Doc told me when I started not to go below 1200 calories/day
Have you been to fitday.com ?
It helped me 2yrs ago and continues to do so.
 
actually i've been traking my intake on fitday everyday ---- its a wonderful diet tool--

i'm trying to keep my intake at 1500 calories and my fat under 30% for now and see how my body reacts
 

I love the fitday.com Web site. It has a great deal of info. When I feel that I am slipping up I always head there to regain some control.

Good luck with your quest.
 
Tiger Lily 03 said:
I love the fitday.com Web site. It has a great deal of info. When I feel that I am slipping up I always head there to regain some control.

Good luck with your quest.

Great website Lily. I like it too!

njcarita...are you trying to lose weight or just eat healthier?
For our weight management patients, we recommend about 1200 cal/day for weight loss.
Definitely try keeping a food diary, writing down everything you put in your mouth (food or liquid). Many people don't realize what their actual daily calorie intake is.
You'll need to burn 500 more calories than you eat everyday to lose one pound per week.
If you hate exercise (and I used to be just like that!), start slow. Walk out your front door, down the street for 10 min then turn around and walk home. Most people can do that with no problem. Build it up as you get more comfortable with it! Cute new workout clothes and shoes sometimes help, too :teeth:
 
From my past experience I would recommend that you have between 1200 - 1500 calories a day, preferably closer to 1500. I lost quite a lot of weight last year in a short amount of time eating 1200 calories a day. The only problem was that I developed an illness (not from the weight loss, at least the doctor doesn't think so!) and I sustained an injury, so I was laid up for a while. Because I had lost the weight fairly quickly, once I couldn't exercise and I wasn't eating as healthily as I had been the pounds started to come back on quite quickly. This time around I am doing WW's and eating more food! :teeth: I know that it will probably take me longer to lose the weight, and that's ok. My goal now is to make this my last weight loss attempt. I want to learn how to keep the weight off, once I have got to me ideal weight.
Good luck to you. I hope that you find what is right for you! :goodvibes
 
is there a calculation or web site that will lmk
There are about 138,000 web site that will let you know. The problem is that there isn't just one web site! :) And then there are the 250,000+ web sites that will tell you not to lose weight focusing on calorie intake. Keep in mind that, with the exception of sites like Calorie King and Fitday, there is little incentive on the 'net to provide an especially effective recommendation in this regard.

Pardon me while I rant for a while....

Many of the recommendations you'll see online are necessarily ultra-conservative -- recommendations that are deliberately anti-aggressive. It's not just that those sites place safety over effectiveness, but rather they put the objective that their recommendation not be the source of any possible harm whatsoever over the likelihood that taking a less aggressive approach could tend to lead to failure of the effort, and therefore add to the risks to health from being overweight or obese.

By the same token, many of the recommendations you'll see online are necessarily over-aggressive, in order to foster a more substantial distinction from traditional approaches, with regard to effectiveness. Many of the most effective approaches have such virulent detractors that they need to over-state their uniqueness, and push the envelope, in order to stand-out.

So what we end up with is a core set of recommendations, supported broadly and widely, that are within themselves utterly innocuous, but comparatively ineffective. Then, scattered around that core set are a vast array of seemingly contradictory recommendations, all of which, when compared against the core, seem to be a little more risky in the short-term to pursue, but a bit more effective in the end, thereby reducing risk long-term. That's why there is such a disparity among recommendations.

Anyway, back to what I said about "the 250,000+ web sites that will tell you not to lose weight focusing on calorie intake." While I used a calorie intake-focused program, I had learned my lesson many years ago about the limited effectiveness of such programs. While calorie intake is a big part of the issue, it is by no means the only thing to be concerned about. We used to combine calorie restriction with eating "low-fat" -- but that approach is generally discredited now. Fats are not all the same, and some of the healthiest and most effective approaches are those that combine calorie restriction with a good amount of (healthy) fat consumption. So I think the best approches now combine calorie restriction, with exercise, elimination of saturated fat and trans-fat (but no other focus on fat -- the calorie restriction should handle that), and ensuring that you get enough protein to spare lean-body mass, which is essential for maintaining your weight-loss long-term.

Doc told me when I started not to go below 1200 calories/day
Folks on diets where they eat less than 1200 calories per day (a very-low calorie diet -- VLCD) need to be under medical supervision. With the program I used, the VLCD patients ate either 500, 800 or 1000 calories per day, while the traditional (female) patients ate 10 calories times per pound of body weight in weight-loss, and 11 calories per pound of body weight in maintenance. (Male patients ate 1 calorie per pound of body weight more.) Those traditional patients who wanted to lose weight a bit faster would eat 10 calories per pound of body weight at their intended healty-weight goal.

As I mentioned before, the program I used was calorie intake- (and exercise) focused, but I "knew better" and combined that with a very clear focus on getting enough protein. When I had lost a substantial amount of weight many years before, I hadn't focused on protein intake at all, and as a result I had lost a substantial amount of lean-body mass, and was unable to maintain my weight-loss more than a couple of years. This time, I aimed for about 100 gm of protein per day, not quite double the minimum daily requirement. Some folks feel that's too little, but I'm not a body builder so I felt that that was enough for me. So far so good. I'm up about 10 pounds from where I should be, after three and a half years, but there are still 90 pounds pretty-much gone for good.

Definitely try keeping a food diary, writing down everything you put in your mouth (food or liquid). Many people don't realize what their actual daily calorie intake is.
Truer words were never spoken, Mel. I can track my success and failure directly to two things: (1) Whether I'm journaling or not, and (2) how much I'm exercising.
 

New Posts


Disney Vacation Planning. Free. Done for You.
Our Authorized Disney Vacation Planners are here to provide personalized, expert advice, answer every question, and uncover the best discounts. Let Dreams Unlimited Travel take care of all the details, so you can sit back, relax, and enjoy a stress-free vacation.
Start Your Disney Vacation
Disney EarMarked Producer






DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter

Add as a preferred source on Google

Back
Top Bottom