Breastfeeding while driving 65 mph . . . a good idea?

Deb in IA

Knows that KIDS are better
Joined
Aug 18, 1999
Messages
12,601
Drive-Thru Feeding
Mom Caught Breast-Feeding Behind Wheel Faces Multiple Charges

June 25— A young mother charged with child endangerment for breast-feeding her baby while driving on the Ohio Turnpike contends that according to the letter of the law, her actions were legal.

Catherine Donkers, 29, of Pittsburgh was arrested on May 8 and charged with obstruction of official business, driving under suspension, failure to have her child in a safety seat, failure to comply and child endangerment.

Donkers said she didn't have time to pull over for a feeding.

"That particular day I did have to be somewhere," Donkers told ABCNEWS' Good Morning America. "I was planning on going to a seminar on Friday morning. I had to get to Michigan that evening," she said.

Donkers said she was wearing a seatbelt, and her 7-month-old daughter was on her lap, on a nursing pillow.

Ignored Lights and Siren

Lt. Rick Fambo, a spokesperson for the Ohio State Highway Patrol, said Donkers was spotted by a state trooper after police received a tip from a motorist on a CB radio who saw her driving with a baby in her lap.

"The trooper observed the vehicle approaching that matched the vehicle reported," Fambo said. "He observed it was speeding and the trooper did follow the vehicle. He attempted to initiate a traffic stop," he said.

Donkers did not respond to the police car's lights or siren, but she slowed to 45 mph, and then motioned that she would pull over, Fambo said. "It took approximately 3 miles for the driver to come to a stop," he said.

Donkers said she didn't pull over because she knew that she was legally within her rights to be breast-feeding, and her car was on cruise control at 65 mph. Donkers also said in a court document that she was afraid because she had been sexually assaulted in the past.

"I didn't feel safe pulling over on the side of the road," Donkers said. "I have twice been sexually assaulted before and my husband has directed me that when I don't feel safe on the highway to go to a safe place where I'm reasonably sure that there might be some witnesses," she said.


Just Common Sense?

Donkers' husband, Brad Barnhill, 46, has said that his religious beliefs put him in charge of his wife's actions and he wants her name cleared. Barnhill, who says his faith is rooted in The First Christian Fellowship for Eternal Sovereignty, claims his wife researched the Michigan state law before she began breast-feeding while driving, and found that it was legal

The law states that children under 4 years of age should be in seats, unless the mother is nursing. Donkers claims she did nothing wrong because Michigan has an exemption to its child restraint law for nursing mothers and because Ohio respects the laws of visiting residents

"With my experience in reading a lot of law, I would think that if the legislators intended for it to specifically exclude drivers, they would have said so in the statute," Donkers said.

Donkers could have had the original police charges, driving without a license, obstructing official business and violating the child safety-seat law, reduced to a single guilty plea to driving under suspension, according to court records. She then could have closed her case by posting a $100 fine. Donkers is scheduled to go on trial the first week in August.


http://abcnews.go.com/sections/GMA/Living/GMA030625Breastfeeding_driver.html
 
were having a lively discussion about this woman and her "dh" on the " Who is a bigger idiot" thread.


I think theyre all idiots.
 
I wonder if she'd be screeching about her rights if she had been in a wreck while driving like that and her child got hurt or worse.:mad: Why didn't she just pull over on the road?

As far as the dh, it bugs me when people hide behind their religious beliefs about things like this.:( Don't they know it's for their child's safety that the seat belt law is in place?
 
Did anyone else see this woman on this morning's Good Morning America? She just didn't seem to care about the safety of her child at all! OOOOOOOOOOhhhhh! She drove me and my DH nuts this morning. And her child was absolutely adorable! :o
 

Donkers said she didn't have time to pull over for a feeding.

:rolleyes:

Nathan's safety is ALWAYS more important that my time!!!! :mad: I don't understand how anyone could take such a risk because it was inconvienent for them to stop.
 
I saw her on GMA this morning as well. I loved when Charlie Gibson asked her if common sense told her that she was endangering her child and she replied "Just getting into a car is risky, everything you do is a risk" or something stupid like that!! I can accept the risk of an accident if the child is in a car seat, but I've heard enough stories from my paramedic friend about what happens to infants on their parents laps in an accident. It's a horrific sight. I think that woman should be help accountable for her actions.
 
Donkers' husband, Brad Barnhill, 46, has said that his religious beliefs put him in charge of his wife's actions and he wants her name cleared.

Gag me with a pitchfork!


How pathetic.
 
I didn't hear about this yet today. (It was probably on while I and the baby were watching the Wiggles.:))

What a wack job!!! Was she in that much of a rush that her baby's safety was of no concern?? :confused: She could and should have pulled over to the side of the road!!

Religous beliefs!!!???!!!!

GIMME A BREAK!!!!!! :mad:
 
I know this falls under the category of too much information but i am currently breastfeeding my child and 10-15 minutes tops can satisfy your child for awhile. That is so much more important then being at a seminar that isn't until the NEXT day!!!!

I am just outraged!!!!!

And don't even get me started on the husband!
 
"That particular day I did have to be somewhere," Donkers told ABCNEWS' Good Morning America. "I was planning on going to a seminar on Friday morning. I had to get to Michigan that evening," she said.

So that's more important than the safety of her child?:confused: :confused: Unbelievable!!!:mad:
 
Although I don't know what the law states specifically, but I'm quite sure the exemption is for a passenger in the car not... THE DRIVER !!!! What a flipping idiot. :rolleyes:
 
People like this make me want to just pull my hair out!!!!!!!!!!!1 I breastfed both of my children and not once....not once did the thought even cross my mind to take them out of their carseat to nurse them let alone do it while I was driving. So your driving down the highway...going 65 and your baby is crying in the backseat because they are hungry, how in the world did she get the baby out and on her lap??? And if she pulled over to get the baby out she could of sat there for 15 minutes and nursed the baby while she was pulled over.

Some people do not use their heads. She was more concerned about getting to where she was going then her own childs safety. I was born and raised in Michigan and had no idea this law existed. To know that this silly stupid law exists, this is not the first time she has nursed this baby while driving so she cannot use the excuse that she had someplace to be.

Okay...i'm done ranting now.
 
Originally posted by gshoemate
People like this make me want to just pull my hair out!!!!!!!!!!!1 I breastfed both of my children and not once....not once did the thought even cross my mind to take them out of their carseat to nurse them let alone do it while I was driving. So your driving down the highway...going 65 and your baby is crying in the backseat because they are hungry, how in the world did she get the baby out and on her lap??? And if she pulled over to get the baby out she could of sat there for 15 minutes and nursed the baby while she was pulled over.
Exactly what I thought when I read this.
Some people do not use their heads. She was more concerned about getting to where she was going then her own childs safety. I was born and raised in Michigan and had no idea this law existed. To know that this silly stupid law exists, this is not the first time she has nursed this baby while driving so she cannot use the excuse that she had someplace to be.

Okay...i'm done ranting now.
I've never heard of this law. If it does exist, I believe some reform legislation is in order.
 


Disney Vacation Planning. Free. Done for You.
Our Authorized Disney Vacation Planners are here to provide personalized, expert advice, answer every question, and uncover the best discounts. Let Dreams Unlimited Travel take care of all the details, so you can sit back, relax, and enjoy a stress-free vacation.
Start Your Disney Vacation
Disney EarMarked Producer






DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter

Add as a preferred source on Google

Back
Top Bottom