In this case the "wrong" was conspiring to keep milk prices high.Lawsuits are fine when a company knowingly did something they knew was wrong.
The lawsuits are the only way to stop things here in the US where cash rules and the only thing respected is financial incentive to do, or not do a thing. Businesses complain about things being litigious, that's nonsense since civil court is a citizen's only tool against the machine. Big business LOVES to lock people into arbitration because it keeps complaints in "them" friendly states, bought and paid for, non disclosure agreements are offered when someone is in a state of shock, these tools are way more offensive IMO.Wasn't even aware this was a thing. I see a constant string of TV ads for any number of different lawsuits. It seems there is an endless list of lawsuits from some group of lawyers to try to make $$$ by pursuing yet another class action lawsuit. In almost all of them, the lawyers make off with the majority of any approved payout. Seems it is more a way for lawyers to make a fast buck vs. any kind of legit settlement with the involved company. Lawsuits are fine when a company knowingly did something they knew was wrong. However, the way the legal system works in the USA, it seems broken to me. Not sure how this works in other countries.
Well first, lawyers won't make any money unless the company either settles or has a verdict go against them. In that way, I think the legal system is just fine.Wasn't even aware this was a thing. I see a constant string of TV ads for any number of different lawsuits. It seems there is an endless list of lawsuits from some group of lawyers to try to make $$$ by pursuing yet another class action lawsuit. In almost all of them, the lawyers make off with the majority of any approved payout. Seems it is more a way for lawyers to make a fast buck vs. any kind of legit settlement with the involved company. Lawsuits are fine when a company knowingly did something they knew was wrong. However, the way the legal system works in the USA, it seems broken to me. Not sure how this works in other countries.
I was wondering if anyone else got a notice for a final settlement payment?
with the initial payment they gave you a few options and I used the Target gift card.
this time I didn't see any options. they issued an eMasterCard.
I got $18.90.
So if we got the first one, we should be getting a second?? I also go the $7...something for Target. I'll be on the lookout in my email.
Beware! The card you sign up for has a $5.95/month inactivity fee that they will charge you. After you spend the money, make sure to get the account closed so you aren't charged.
In this case the "wrong" was conspiring to keep milk prices high.
The case was filed years ago (The suit covered anyone who purchased milk in 15 states, including Arizona, for the 14 years prior to 2017) and settled in 2019. Not talking about milk prices today.How are milk prices high? Milk is cheaper per gallon than most bottled waters.
there was nothing ever said about in inactivity fee. If there no funds left on the card how do they charge the fee. Was this on all cards. I took the prepaid MC which I used several months ago and haven’t heard anything more.
These types of class action cases take years to either litigate or settle. The law firm is not paid until or unless there is a settlement or verdict in their favor. In the meantime they pay the salaries, benefits etc or attorneys and other staff and they have to front the litigation costs which can include experts (likely), travel, depositions etc. If they lose, they are out all that money and time. Its definitely not a "fast buck" and while the lawyers may take a large percentage of any award/settlement, they are also taking on the entire risk.Wasn't even aware this was a thing. I see a constant string of TV ads for any number of different lawsuits. It seems there is an endless list of lawsuits from some group of lawyers to try to make $$$ by pursuing yet another class action lawsuit. In almost all of them, the lawyers make off with the majority of any approved payout. Seems it is more a way for lawyers to make a fast buck vs. any kind of legit settlement with the involved company. Lawsuits are fine when a company knowingly did something they knew was wrong. However, the way the legal system works in the USA, it seems broken to me. Not sure how this works in other countries.
I *THINK* most sites, once you run the card, if there's not enough there, they'll deduct the card amount from the balance. So if you're trying to buy a $20 item and you put in a $5 GC, it will process then say you owe $15 and you can put in another card.the other question I have is how to use this card. so I go online to buy something, then I enter this card and drain the funds, what happens next? are most sites geared to handle multiple cards?