dtsaos said:
so basically what some of you are saying is that it's better to hold your baby and not attach them to you so that if the plane crashes your baby can go flying out of your arms and have certain death? I never heard about the baby acting as an "air bag" thing before, but even if that's true, why would the airlines let you just "hold" them if that's the case? Pretty much if you hold them without a restriant system then they will definetly die if the plane crashes but you might survive? Sounds pretty crappy to me! On the other hand if you bring a car seat, what are the odds that the baby will actually stay in it during flight anyway? So you're right back to holding your baby without restraint again! That's why to me the baby b'air makes so much sense. And let's be real people, no I don't have statistics on this but I'm pretty sure that for the most part when planes crash there's very little chance for survival unlike when cars get into accidents. I hate to say this but i really think that the whole car seat on planes thing started because it became the politically correct thing to do.
Lst year I was on a similar thread to this, and I suggested the baby b'air and someone that was sooooo against it said that it was totally illegal and that one step ahead didn't sell it anymore, etc. I was like "oh my G_ _ ! i'm so sorry that I brought it up" and then I checked the one step ahead website and Lo and behold it was still for sale. So I'm hesitant to believe that there's been lots of incidents where the airlines have not let people wear the baby b'air. As we've seen on this thread, I'm not the only one who has successfully worn one and not been told not to.
Ok - I am not saying it is better to hold your baby, fwiw I am in favor of using a CSR for a baby and personally would not fly with a lap baby. However that is not the question the OP asked so I am trying to answer her question - what to do with a lap baby, hold baby on your lap!!
The FAA and American Academy of Pediatrics both recommend a CSR and neither approve of the use of the harness/vest type devices for aircraft travel. In fact the FAA does not allow them for take off or landing and most carriers don't allow them at all. Why do the airlines "let you" hold them, well my guess is $$ and statistics but I can't answer that.
Again this is not my opinion it is FAA regulations. I don't doubt you used one and I am sure you made the best decsion for your family based on the informaiton at the time. I am saying that I have personally seen the FA not allow a sling and also a BBA, October 04 and December 04. You may be hesitant to beleive me, that's ok, but I have seen it.
Check out any US carriers website on traveling with children and the wording is quite clear. I guess its up to the individual FA's as to the enforcement.
I posted the link in my eariler post along with a quote, every carrier has similar wording.
As for an emergency situation you will not be able to hold your baby but baby will be placed on the floor between your feet to prevent the baby becoming a projectile. DH was in such a situation when they could not verify the landing gear was operating properly. Luckily it was, but they had to prepare for an emergency landing. He said it was very scary, so scary that we never even considered not using the CSR with our kids. And yes they did stay in the carseat, they do in the car and the did in the air it was familiar and comfortable.
Why is the BBA still for sale? Honestly this baffles me, I can't undersand why they can claim what they claim. Perhaps they are ok for overseas flights. I know that if I bought one only to be denied its use by an FA I would be expecting a full refund.
TJ