3DisneyFanz
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2015
- Messages
- 1,343
Well when someone can tell me what benefit Disney is getting from this investment then I'll look at it from their perspective. There certainly seems to be very little they are going to get out of this that they couldn't/shouldn't have been able to get before. At this point it's really just traffic patterns and cash transactions they can capture now and just because the Smiths skip Pecos Bill for Sleepy Hollow doesn't really mean much since the Jones are skipping Sleepy Hollow for Pecos Bills. They don't even need this to try and upsell anything to you either. I can look at your reservation detail and see you have two 2-10 year olds and offer you a A&E ticket plan at a cost without ever having to know you tried unsuccessfully for FP+.You can't have it both ways. If you're not willing to look at the benefit to Disney the corporation, you shouldn't be looking at the cost to Disney the corporation.
If you're going to look at what Disney spent, you need to look at how Disney benefits, not how you benefit.
If you're looking at how many new attractions there are, you need to look at what your costs are, not Disney's. There is a legitimate argument there, as others have suggested about the admission rising more than inflation without a similar increase in attractions at the park (though I haven't been tracking that argument closely enough to be sure it's correct).
Even if you want to argue they can schedule staffing better keep in mind you're primarily discussing people barely above minimum wage and I'd bet what you can cut will be far less than system maintenance and is being replaced by the people manning the roving kiosks and increased GS staff.