88Keys said:
Again, I get all of this -- the issue is not integrity; it's what can and can't be protected -- and I, being a musician, do not burn CDs and understand intellectual property (I am also a magician and never betray secrets). Also, it has been posted a few times that TGM works hard and deserves that money -- I am not denying that -- my point is that, so do the other resources that are freely shared on this fantastic website. It just seems not quite in the spirit of what we do here on this website, which is bring together our various backgrounds, research, and experience to help each other get the most out of WDW. I probably won't subscribe because I help too many people plan their
Disney vacations and would feel bad holding back what I know. It sounds like a neat subscription, though. Best vacations to all of you!
88Keys, all your posts on this thread have been valid points, well made. I'm I struggling to understand why almost everyone has misinterpreted them.
The intellectual property rights for the UG and for TGM are identical - both are copyrighted material (as is recorded music). Interestingly, copyrighting allows you to stop others copying what you've written (so, for example, anyone reproducing a substantial part of the texts of UG or TGM here on the DIS would be in breach), but not the underlying ideas or information.
I am a repeat purchaser of the UG
and a repeat subscriber to TGM. I would say the reason why some folks here are willing to share information from guidebooks, whilst fervently defending TGM's right to have his work protected, is down to some sort of sense of personal connection. The way in which TGM's articles are written (he addresses you by name in every other sentence), together with the fact that he posts on the forums and responds to your emails even though he must receive thousands, leads you to believe that you know him. If a friend tells you a secret and asks you to keep it to yourself, you'll most likely comply. We seem to have less of a conscience when it comes to copying CDs or software, etc.
And then, of course, there is the whole feeling that this is somehow an elite club. I've got all this insider knowledge (and there
really are some genuine gems), so why would I want to put it in the public domain?
I read copious amounts of information regarding WDW (both in printed form and on the web) and I do sometimes wonder if I might unwittingly pass on proprietary information to those asking for help with their trip planning, but I'm fairly confident that I never have as far as TGM is concerned. I say that because whilst, of course, there is plenty of stuff on his site which is available elsewhere (such as park hours, attraction descriptions, restaurant menus, etc.), the information which is truly unique to TGM is very easy to spot! You will know that you've never seen it anywhere else - it's like someone's switched on the light! A good example is the 'Least Crowded Parks' articles - detailed advice for
every day of the year together with the thinking behind it. This information alone is worth the subscription cost. Like some other posters, I do find the site a little difficult to navigate at times, but it's a great resource and one I'm glad I found.