We are headed to WDW at the end of Feb. we have been 3 times in the last 4 years. Each time, we have park hopped. In april of 2013, our older kids were 7 and almost 6 years old and did great being out of the room all day.
This trip is our first with our 2 year old twins. we will need to go back to naps and rest each day for this trip. With the new FP+ system limiting our options on FP.....I'm thinking of just not park hopping at all. We used to be able to FP a few rides at each park and we would often travel based on our dining or evening events. With the little ones goings, we are expecting to split up most day. One parent will do the nap/rest back at the resort and the other parent stays out with the older kids. Since we may not be able to fit in all three FP+ options in the evening, before the twins get tired, I'm thinking there is no reason to park hop.
I sort of feel like if Disney is going to severely limit my FP options, I'm going to do my best to limit our spending. for our MK days, I'm thinking of doing all the "baby" rides with the twins at RD. then, one parent takes them to nap, while the other parent stays and can use the FP+ on the more popular rides during the absence of the babies. then, in the evening of MK days, we meet up in tomorrowland /fantasyland as a whole family and do what has the least amount of waiting.
now, i will say that we are going during a low crowd week, so I am hopeful that standby lines will be manageable . that is playing into my decision.
is my thinking flawed? I'd be saving $275 or so on the park hop option!!!
This trip is our first with our 2 year old twins. we will need to go back to naps and rest each day for this trip. With the new FP+ system limiting our options on FP.....I'm thinking of just not park hopping at all. We used to be able to FP a few rides at each park and we would often travel based on our dining or evening events. With the little ones goings, we are expecting to split up most day. One parent will do the nap/rest back at the resort and the other parent stays out with the older kids. Since we may not be able to fit in all three FP+ options in the evening, before the twins get tired, I'm thinking there is no reason to park hop.
I sort of feel like if Disney is going to severely limit my FP options, I'm going to do my best to limit our spending. for our MK days, I'm thinking of doing all the "baby" rides with the twins at RD. then, one parent takes them to nap, while the other parent stays and can use the FP+ on the more popular rides during the absence of the babies. then, in the evening of MK days, we meet up in tomorrowland /fantasyland as a whole family and do what has the least amount of waiting.
now, i will say that we are going during a low crowd week, so I am hopeful that standby lines will be manageable . that is playing into my decision.
is my thinking flawed? I'd be saving $275 or so on the park hop option!!!
. our first trip, my older son was just under 3. he napped, needed diapers, etc. I'm in a panic imagining 2 kids at that age. I can't just count on one baby to "fall asleep" in the stroller, etc. there will be two of them, both unpredictable. For sanity's sake, and FP sake, I think that forcing ourselves to be in one park each day may just be easier this time. crowd levels will be at 3 or 4 our week, so I pray that helps my plan. I'm just not feeling the "value" I once did to pay so much to park hop when I can't FP at each park! 
