Great advice - it does lead me to another question. On the surface it looks like a 2057 exp is better than a 2042. But we are 50 and have an 8-year-old. I just wonder if saddling her with annual dues is the way to go. I guess she could always sell it, but is there even any argument that a 2042 is BETTER than a 2057?
i have another timeshare that does not have an end date. i like that OKW has an end date of 2042.
but in general, at 2043, SSR will most likely have value and OKW-2042 will be $0. at this point, selling SSR is easy. i wouldn't be that worried about saddling a child with
DVC since it has historically been an asset. (which does not mean that it is impossible for disney to mess it up - there is some risk there.)
to be more explicit, do you think getting a studio at BWV or BCV or even BLT or VWL would be easy, moderately easy, or very difficult at the 7-month mark for a june or july 10-night stay?
at this point, if you are flexible as to the specific summer week and are online at 8am when the window opens, i think BLT-lake view, VWL, or BWV-pool/garden view should be at least moderately easy to get. (if you are close, don't be afraid to ride the waitlist.)
the thing is that DVC is always changing. new members may be more picky than old members about buying at BWV or BCV or BLT to stay at their home resort - so if a significant percentage of a resorts' owners start booking at 10-11 months out, then what is true last year may not be true going forward.
in 2008-2009, a bad economy meant a lot of layoffs and uncertainty - getting something at 7 months out in DVC was easier since a lot of DVC owners banked their pts and didn't travel. then that cycle ended and a lot of owners were using those banked pts and making booking more difficult.
right now, your plan should work but i agree with jerseyduke - don't buy SSR if you absolutely don't want to stay there. buy where you don't mind staying.