hardcorestitch
MEEGA NALA KWEESTA!
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2024
- Messages
- 6,581
The most hilarious summons I have ever seen.
I don’t know if I should be laughing or in shock that CT doesn’t check DOB when sending out Jury summons.The most hilarious summons I have ever seen.
They ought to put minimum DOB equivalent of an 18 yr old every year for that..I don’t know if I should be laughing or in shock that CT doesn’t check DOB when sending out Jury summons.
The source they got her name from may not have a DOB on it. They used Library card records here, and those don't list a DOB. We have done stories here on people under 18 getting called.I don’t know if I should be laughing or in shock that CT doesn’t check DOB when sending out Jury summons.
Well... if you want an unbiased opinion, I think someone made the correct choice!The most hilarious summons I have ever seen.
That seems like it would not create a jury pool fully reflective of the residents. In my state it is DMV and voter registration databases.The source they got her name from may not have a DOB on it. They used Library card records here, and those don't list a DOB. We have done stories here on people under 18 getting called.
Looking at it I guess it's because of the sources they use to pull for jury duty, not so much that they don't check for date of birth but rather a source, the department of revenue, does not include date of births. The rest of the sources used for jury duty poll do include date of birth.I don’t know if I should be laughing or in shock that CT doesn’t check DOB when sending out Jury summons.
I agree. We have reciprocal agreements throughout the metro area and including a system located not far from me but still not technically speaking in my metro.That seems like it would not create a jury pool fully reflective of the residents. In my state it is DMV and voter registration databases.
I guess I just assumed DOB would be a requirement and that if a system they pulled names from didn't include a DOB field or it was blank they would just discard that record and move onto the next one. I don't know what sources or how they do the process but that was just my thought.Looking at it I guess it's because of the sources they use to pull for jury duty, not so much that they don't check for date of birth but rather a source, the department of revenue, does not include date of births. The rest of the sources used for jury duty poll do include date of birth.
This wouldn't be the only situation to have come up if the system is set up that way.
Oh I agree with you, date of birth should be used because there's laws regarding when you're eligible for jury duty, that only makes sense to me (and you).I guess I just assumed DOB would be a requirement and that if a system they pulled names from didn't include a DOB field or it was blank they would just discard that record and move onto the next one. I don't know what sources or how they do the process but that was just my thought.
Possibly, depending on the financial situation and the parents' decision in filing taxes.So was the four year old filing taxes? How is he on the DOR's radar?
Nah. If the source record(s) doesn't include DOB they likely don't weed out until it gets to a juror qualification questionnaire. I don't know if all states do those, but here it comes several months prior to a jury summons.I guess I just assumed DOB would be a requirement and that if a system they pulled names from didn't include a DOB field or it was blank they would just discard that record and move onto the next one.
They use those as well. Tax rolls, both income and property tax are used too. As the Jury Commissioner put it at the briefing, "we will find you"That seems like it would not create a jury pool fully reflective of the residents. In my state it is DMV and voter registration databases.
Couldn't it be because the 4yr old is the dependent?So was the four year old filing taxes? How is he on the DOR's radar?