So I have been thinking about this ever since they were announced and all the protests, and thankfully backtrack by Disney.
Since from my understanding one of the main points of not being able to do this was the extra points made up by Disney by separating lock offs ( hope that is right ), why then was there not the same issue with the new resorts and dedicated weeks. What I mean is those dedicated weeks needed 10% more points to secure, but if you cancel and get your points and then book that week you have reserved, you would net yourself 10% points to use or bank. If you stayed in your reserved week and did not cancel and rebook, then Disney gets those extra points to do with what they want? Is this correct?
Just looking for understanding and why there was not any issues with this for VGF or Poly.
Thanks.
Since from my understanding one of the main points of not being able to do this was the extra points made up by Disney by separating lock offs ( hope that is right ), why then was there not the same issue with the new resorts and dedicated weeks. What I mean is those dedicated weeks needed 10% more points to secure, but if you cancel and get your points and then book that week you have reserved, you would net yourself 10% points to use or bank. If you stayed in your reserved week and did not cancel and rebook, then Disney gets those extra points to do with what they want? Is this correct?
Just looking for understanding and why there was not any issues with this for VGF or Poly.
Thanks.
