I haven't seen this breakdown before, but I am fascinated that the DxDP credits come in so much lower than the
DDP TS credits when the math is done, knowing that with the DxDP you also get an appetizer.
I guess Disney is actually counting on DxDP customers using up 2 credits at a signature restaurant, leaving credits behind unused, or using DxDP credits at QS locations. If they actually were able to handle 3 table service meals per day with appetizers and deserts then Disney make the least amount of money!!
The difference was even greater in 2012 where a DDP TS credit "cost" ~$34 and a DxDDP credit cost ~$26. It's the primary force that drives DxDDP to continue (even with new prices) to be a much better deal than DDP, especially once you consider the entitlements. The gap is slowly closing, and the casualty will be the fact that you could still come out plenty ahead and not use all your credits (something I've done for 3 years now, usually leaving around 2 or 3 unused and still a couple hundred bucks ahead of the cost, while solo). This is going to change it considerably though, and if I can't come out ahead with that pattern, it's going to shift over to TiW (if I spring for an AP or decide to move to Pensacola

) or OOP (much more likely).
The savings were always better using 3 TS per day than doing 1 normal and 1 signature, as the signatures were rarely (if ever) twice the actual cost of a 1 TS. In 2012, this meant that you'd need to get ~$52 worth of covered items to break even in a single 2 credit meal. With 3 courses, this wasn't entirely too difficult. It was still tougher than getting $26 worth of covered items for a 1 credit meal (especially considering the 3 courses), but not too difficult.
For 2013, the math changes quite a bit (well, the results change, the math, since it's math, stays the same

). We now need ~$62 for a 2 TS to break even. While it's still doable, it's not nearly as "easy" as it was to do before.
Nothing terrible to admit. You also had it all paid for when you got to Disney, and didn't have to face the food bill after the trip.
While you see I'm all about the numbers

, this is also true. How much value you place on this convenience is wholly subjective and is absolutely a part of it. If you come up with a loss of say, $50 over your trip, you decide if $50 is worth the convenience factor to you. For some, it's a certain yes, for others, it's a certain no (just like if the savings were only $50, they may decide against it to enjoy flexibility).
It's all part of figuring out what is right for you, and convenience/flexibility certainly can factor into the equation.
For a different example of this, a bottle of milk may be $4 at the corner store right near your house, but only $3.50 at the grocery store downtown (for my example, you don't live downtown

). Is it worth that savings to go downtown where you may also have more selection, or are you willing to spend a little more so that you get back quickly and don't have to worry about it. Wholly subjective (and we're not counting gas and all that

) and absolutely no right answer except what you feel is most worthwhile.
(and yay! My dragon came back! (I was bad in the TPAS forum last month so he and my siggy had to take a vacation).)