Face shields are not masks. It's not a matter of interpretation here.
Face shields are definitely masks. There is no world where...
is a mask, and...
is a mask, and...
is a mask, but...
is not a mask.
And no a dictionary definition contrary to your belief does not make your assertation go in your favor.
This is an interesting rebuttal, I'm not really sure what you are saying. What better source for the definition of words than a dictionary would you recommend?
Merriam-Webster says that a mask may be "a protective covering for the face", and "a comparable device to prevent exhalation of infectious material". Dictionary_com defines it as, "any protective covering for the face or head." thefreedictionary allows, "A protective covering for the face or head." Cambridge dictionary says a mask is, "a covering for all or part of the face that
protects, hides, or decorates the person wearing it".
Every dictionary I can find includes a definition for the word "mask" that absolutely describes that clear face shield.
They are two different things. You will often see people wearing both, at the same time, in medical settings. You can read research on the efficacy differences. I don’t think you wrote what you did with any malice, but it could harm someone and I would, personally, appreciate if you edited your post.
I was speaking broadly and used the words 'mask' and 'babies' because they apply very broadly. I did not recommend anyone put a N95 respirator or a surgical mask on an infant.
But if you are going to bring your potentially contagious child, of whatever age, along to share a space with 20 or 30 thousand other people, and Disney would like me to be one of them, then steps should be taken to limit that kid, as a transmission source. Whatever the specific approach is that is most suitable for the specific child, it comes down to the same thing. A mask.
Air+ markets a
power assisted N95 for children as young as 3 years. For an infant that might mean a plastic barrier or draping a cloth over the stroller, as the AAP
recommends. That's along the lines of what I had in mind if the subject were an infant. I'm happy to repeat the CDC recommendation that children under two not wear face masks that might restrict breathing. That seams to be the common wisdom here and now. Though there is a James Dyson Award winning design for
a filter respirator for infants that incorporates a pacifier nipple.
I will say though, that I never thought to be quite so specific, mainly because the practice of putting a filter mask on one's baby is common in other parts of the world. Maybe babies in Singapore are just more resistant to suffocation than our babies, because their
infant mortality rate is far lower. In fact, not that long ago the Stritch School of Medicine, citing CDC research,
produced a helpful guide for equipping pediatric patients with face masks, including patients younger than 6 months old. It included direction to "Fold adult sized masks in half and fit them across their small faces" and warned of a sorta adorable risk, "... of misidentifying children when multiple siblings are wearing masks".
TL:;DR
Don't wrap cloth around a baby's face. I mean, unless of course it's a common practice where where you are and there are not regular news reports of babies suffocating, in which case who am I or anyone else to tell you what to do?