PlutosFriend
<font color=royalblue>Spoke too soon<br><font colo
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2004
Le Cellier and Ohana. Not that they were bad, I just expected much more.
Todd&Copper said:Excellent point, but I disagree that Celler is better than Outback. Different, but I really don't think it is better.
Le Cellier We enjoy eating there, but can't believe that this has become THE place to go. I think Outback Steakhouse is better.
KJET54 said:just got back, loved the steak at Le Cellier's but the service was the worse I have ever had. We spent 3 hours in there, 2 of which we were trying to get our waitresses attention. I will never do the dining plan again. I am going in february and plan on eating only at restaurants who do not honor the dining plan.
PrincessTrisha said:Earl of Sandwich
It seems so popular on this board but I didn't get what all the hype was?
The bread wasn't that great and the fillings were okay but nothing really "special". The sandwich seemed really squished up and gloopy.
I'd rather have Panera Bread anyday!
Lewisc said:When people post about restaurants at WDW we don't always know what kind of restaurants they patronize at home. When a guest praises the steak at Le Cellier we don't always know if they normally have steak at the Sizzler, Outback or the Palm.
When people post about Tony's we don't know if they're comparing the food to Pizza Hut, Olive Garden or a good local Italian restaurant.
Le Cellier is certainly better than Outback but isn't in the same category as restaurants like Shula's or the Palm. I wouldn't expect to be but a few posters say something like the best steak they've ever had. That's a reach.
PrincessTrisha said:Earl of Sandwich
It seems so popular on this board but I didn't get what all the hype was?
The bread wasn't that great and the fillings were okay but nothing really "special". The sandwich seemed really squished up and gloopy.
I'd rather have Panera Bread anyday!