Alice Sr.
My little Mouseketeer
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2000
Nov 1-7, there was a day in the middle that was not available, it seems like it was the 3rd but maybe it was the 2nd.What dates? I booked the 3rd-7th at 11 months in that room. No walking.
Nov 1-7, there was a day in the middle that was not available, it seems like it was the 3rd but maybe it was the 2nd.What dates? I booked the 3rd-7th at 11 months in that room. No walking.
At 11 months, it's impossible for a day in the middle to be unavailable. You must have been booking a few days later.Nov 1-7, there was a day in the middle that was not available, it seems like it was the 3rd but maybe it was the 2nd.
Nov 1-7, there was a day in the middle that was not available, it seems like it was the 3rd but maybe it was the 2nd.
At 11 months, it's impossible for a day in the middle to be unavailable. You must have been booking a few days later.
Nope, that's impossible. Even it it's a lock-off; if the first day is available, the whole stay is available.These were 2BR's and at BWV that means only lock-offs. And that in turn means there could be days in the middle unavailable. The studios had been booking up.
Nope, that's impossible. Even it it's a lock-off; if the first day is available, the whole stay is available.
I'm sorry, I guess I misunderstood "in the middle."Of course - I was focused on rooms a day or two in advance being gone and not about the first day also.
I'm sorry, I guess I misunderstood "in the middle."
My existing and waitlist was created on 12/2 which appears to be the day after the window opened based on a request made for the same date but in 2017 (I used the check when you can reserve tool for 2017). Would the leap year make a one day difference on the resv window opening? I swear I made it the day the window opened not the day after. It was very important to me to get those dates and I knew it would be an aggressively sought after week. I remember counting down for the window to open so if I was a day late, I don't know I did that
"Impossible" might have been a strong word. I have seen mistakes where room inventory was not properly loaded or rooms were taken out for refurbishment causing some issues. And fixed-weeks could cause that to happen in the future, but it's all exceedingly unlikely. And, if inventory does show up incorrectly, it can be fixed by getting a supervisor on the phone.That would make a bit more sense that you were a day late. With short months and leap years it can get confusing.
I would support something similar to that maybe not the whole month. I totally agree with allowing 14 nights, I had to make my DD's Aulani honeymoon resv in two parts and I don't own there so had to wait until the 7 month window opened. It was for a slower time of year (Sept) so we were lucky.I didn't vote. It would depend on the restriction.
I would not want every date change to be a cancel and rebook. But I would be OK with a "No modification to reservations made between 10-11 months in advance until 10 months prior to arrival" restriction. I'd couple that with a change to allow a reservation of up to 14 nights (instead of 7) to accommodate our overseas members who prefer longer stays. That wouldn't totally stop walking, but it would get rid of almost all of it.
I agree, not impossible, as Anal Annie's situation indicates but highly unlikely I think. Giving way to my conspiracy theory nature and a vague recollection that I did try to walk it but was not successful so chalked it up to goofing up the process, I think there is something peculiar about the whole situation. But live and learn. If that's my biggest complaint these days, I'm doing pretty good. Thanks for the discussion and trying to straighten me out lol."Impossible" might have been a strong word. I have seen mistakes where room inventory was not properly loaded or rooms were taken out for refurbishment causing some issues. And fixed-weeks could cause that to happen in the future, but it's all exceedingly unlikely. And, if inventory does show up incorrectly, it can be fixed by getting a supervisor on the phone.
IN MY OPINION...
Personally, I don't see DVC taking action on this. Most members are simply unaware of the practice so they're not going to complain. The practice doesn't harm Disney, and there's no reason for Disney to take any action at this point. Placing restrictions on booking is going to harm the flexibility of the reservation system, so I'm not sure I'd want any changes. As I said, “the cure may be worse than the disease”.
I have never walked a reservation, and someone walking a reservation has never harmed me, as I have never been locked out of booking what I want. I get the reservation I want - 100% of the time - because I book my home resort at the 11-month window and I don't book he hard-to-get types of reservations. So, I have no skin in this game and am fine with the way things work now.
That's my opinion. What's yours?
My guess is that there the majority will vote "No" on the poll.