We understand that in this economy everyone should be willing to give up something for the betterment of our countrys financial welfare. We are more than willing to bargain with Verizon to come up with a fair contract for everyone involved. We are not asking for anything more than what we already have and have had for years!
Please, someone else read this paragraph and see if I understand it correctly...
According to the union, everyone should be willing to give up something.
The union is willing to bargain for a 'fair' contract.
They don't want anything more than they already have.
So everyone should be willing to give up something EXCEPT the union?
Can a Verizon union employee answer the following questions...
1) Is Verizon offering a 401K (with or without match) or other retirement benefit to replace the pension?
2) Does someone who is vested in the pension STILL get the money they've earned when they retire?
3) How many sick days did each employee have before the strike and how many does Verizon want to cut?
4) How many paid Holidays did each employee have before the strike and how many does Verizon want to cut?
5) How much does Verizon want employees to pay for health care?
6) Has the union put up a counter offer OTHER than 'we want what we've gotten in the past'?
The more I think of this the more I think it's bad luck on the union's part. I don't know the last time they negotiated the contract, but it's too bad the contract had to end NOW, while the economy is still recovering. If the renewal would have been during "good times", VZ probably wouldn't have blinked.
I also think the reason there is so much of an "anti-union" backlash from the public is many people don't see Verizon's proposals as unreasonable, because most employees have already made all these transitions. This does not mean non-union employees want union members to get the same as they do. Speaking for myself, I don't care if 'Joe Lineman' gets all the benefits he wants or not. I simply feel the union is not doing this the right way.