I like Toms, I just alternate between pairs. I've always gotten blisters at Disney - until I switched to Toms! No blisters, not even any "hot spots" that could develop into blisters!
This year, I've got two pairs of amphibious hiking shoes though and may wind up wearing those some though - I've taken one pair on several long hikes up and down the sides of bluffs, through creek beds and such and my feet have been comfy the whole time. They're definitely something to look into, as you get the benefit of a sandal with the protection of a sneaker/hiking shoe.
I have two favorite water sandals, one is a Teva and one (my favorite of the two) came from Walmart of all places - it was a desperation buy when I had to get SOMETHING and was stuck with only that option - but they're more comfortable and have been through more heck without giving me grief than any of my Columbia, Teva or Skecher sandals! (Keens are generally too narrow for me. Also, they tend to fall apart sooner than Columbia and Teva, at least for the mucking about in mud, dirt, salt water and creek water that DH and I do.)
I think I'm sticking with my Toms and adding in amphibious shoes on days I know we'll ride watery rides.
I do have good, high $$ running shoes too. . .but not sure I want to waste some of my shoe miles wearing those at Disney. Maybe if my bursitis acts up!