Rush says actor Fox exagerated symptoms!

Status
Not open for further replies.
aztecgoods said:
See that's my prob with hyper libs. It's easy to be a hyper lib, all you have to do is be for EVERYTHING, and say yes to everything. They are for govt funded everything. It's what seperates the men from the boys to know when and where to say no, and to, here's a concept, operate within the confines of a real BUDGET, like ordinary folks have too. Gosh I wish I could operate like the govt.

Honey we need to go to WDW, ok, no prob., honey we need a new rolls, no prob., honey we need a 7500 sq ft house instead of a 5500 one, no prob. well just spend more.

Real follks can't do that, but it seems like everytime it comes up for a new tax increase, the govt always needs MORE, and can't cut in other areas to fund the particular pet project of the day. Both state, local and fed govt that's all I hear all day long, need more need more need more, feed the monster. It's not monopoly money we're dealing with but tax payer money. Eventually there will be a limit and/or a collapse.

And by the way, I'm not saying Bush and the current Rep haven't been among the worst in this area, they are spend spend spend, worry about how we pay for it later. That's why I don't know why you hyper libs don't love this crop. They are pretty much for funding everything, except this issue I guess.

And by the way I agree on stem cell research as far as the private sector, it is a great area that I hope goes far. I'm just not sure if it would help ANY to get the govt involved. Usually that may even slow the research up, cause now you'd be dealing with govt bureacrats, red tape, can't fund this but can fund that. You'll probably get further with the research to leave the govt out of it altogether.

But the thing is , if it is private sector who finances it , they are the one who are going to decide what they do with there find. If theyfind something , but think that let say , china is going to be abetter market for them , so it's China !

The private sector is obviously in it for the money. You just have to look at what happens to AIDS medecine: the pharmaseutical companies have medecine that can trully help people and give them a better life. Africa is poor and many countries dont have the money to buy the medecine , but since the big pharma are in it for the money , they dont lower the price for countries that really need the medecine. If it would be a governement who would have found the treatment , it would be this governement who decides how much to charge for these medecine , and since a governement is not supposed to be in it for the money , they can accept a smaller profit on the medecine. All this is of course over simplified , I know , but for me , the health of the citizen of a country is more important than the profits for a multinational company. A governement who does not take care of it's people is irresponsible: the healthier citizen are , the more productive and happy they are , and that runs the economy a lot better than citizens who cannot afford healthcare. ( and no , our "socialist healthcare is not perfect here in canada)

So I think that governement should help fund health researche.
 
crazyforgoofy said:
Remember you can put ANYONE you want on IGNORE and never have to read another bit of cr.., er I mean never have to read anything else they post. :thumbsup2 ;)

Oh yes, I have, thanks. :thumbsup2
 
aztecgoods said:
Yes calling someone you disagree with a "big fat idiot" is definitely one of the most intellectually superior ways to go to counter any argument. Al Franken is definitely one of the intellectual giants of our time. His huge ratings of 27.3 listeners and one lonely guys hound dog have taken the radio industry by storm. I eagerly anticipate any upcoming intellectually superior opinions of his when they are announced. I hear that his ratings have actually forced his network to cease broadcasting with normal equipment and they are now using Cambells Soup cans with string attached to them.

Some more intellectually superior come backs for those whom you oppose.

"Sorry scum sucking Fa$#%ot"
"Lieing piece of resis monkey S$#@ bag"
"Fat ugly Moth$#@ F$#@ing A$$ho$#"

If you need more let me know, but this should get ya started.

I have and still listen to Air America and Al Franken on XM radio. His broadcasts are loud and clear. In fact he was just talking about the upcoming bloodbath the republicans are about to take.

Guess old Al did get his message across.

PS... when you're finished with those soup cans pleae place them in the recycle bin along with all of the rest of the republican garbage. Please do so by November 7th. That's when the Democrats are going to come along and take out the trash.
 


shrubber said:
I do stand corrected. Thank you. He became a citizen a few years ago.
Maybe he can become a citizen of Kahakastan next and lobby their goverment if this doesn't work out.

Or become Governor of California.
 
aztecgoods said:
Yes it sounds very very familar, you and those on here that agree with you, IF THEY DISAGREE WITH US CALL THEM NAMES, blow hard, horse's behind, bigot, homophobe. I'm sure you have more names, but theres a few of your favorites.

My main problem is just the intolerance you guys have for opinions and people that disagree with you. You act soooooo sanctomonius, and we all know you are the chosen liberal elite, while at the same time esposing TOLERANCE of others, but at the same time being very intolerant of anyone and anything that disagrees with your views.

Some on here have even gone so far as to say Rush should be in jail. That's the same line of thinking that led to Nazism, if they disagree with us politically, send them to the concentration camps.

I guess you guys think its a darn shame that having conservative views isn't technically illegal so you COULD throw peeps like Rush in jail.

Wellllll, just not yet right???? Maybe when you dems get back in power you can do just that. See you got something to live for now.


I invoke Godwin's Law.
 
fabshelly said:
I invoke Godwin's Law.

ugh? I think you misunderstand, I was making the same "call peeps names" argument there, I wasn't calling anyone those names, someone else was and I was calling them out for name calling. Circular I know sorry.
 


Mrs.Toad said:
Fox is a famous actor.
I agree with him on this issue.
So, I am a famous actor?? :confused3

You didn't take logic in college, did you? ;)

OMGBBQCANIHAVEYOURAUTOGRAPH?????
 
Judge Smails said:
I have and still listen to Air America and Al Franken on XM radio. His broadcasts are loud and clear. In fact he was just talking about the upcoming bloodbath the republicans are about to take.

Guess old Al did get his message across.

PS... when you're finished with those soup cans pleae place them in the recycle bin along with all of the rest of the republican garbage. Please do so by November 7th. That's when the Democrats are going to come along and take out the trash.

Yes if the super genius of our time Al Franken said it you can take it to the bank. I suggest you mortgage your house and bet all you own and possess on that.

"arggggg, that's the worst looking hat I ever saw, I guess when you buy a hat like that they give you a free bowl of soup.....oh it looks good on you though" (Rodney Dangerfield)
 
minnie61650 said:
The admendment states:

(1) No person may clone or attempt to clone a human being.

Read further...The problem is that the proposal so narrowly defines cloning as to open the door in Missouri to any cloning procedure that takes place OUTSIDE the womb.


(2) “Clone or attempt to clone a human being” means to implant in a uterus or attempt to implant in a uterus anything other than the product of fertilization of an egg of a human female by a sperm of a human male for the purpose of initiating a pregnancy that could result in the creation of a human fetus, or the birth of a human being.

nothing there about human clone OUTSIDE the womb.
 
Mrs.Toad said:
How does this amendment "legalize" cloning if it's not already legal? :confused3

There is no federal ban on human cloning, that is being held up by Harry Ried.
The laws enforcing human cloning are set now state to state. Most states have banned cloning with Missourri being an exception
 
shrubber said:
There is no federal ban on human cloning, that is being held up by Harry Ried.
The laws enforcing human cloning are set now state to state. Most states have banned cloning with Missourri being an exception
Then why use the term "legalize" when it's already legal in Missouri?
 
And we are worried about cloning humans outside of the human bodies because....? What do you think they will do, put a cloned human embryo inside of a dog and bring it to term or something?

Talk about paranoia.
 
I just hope they don't clone Harry Reid. But I would be all for cloning someone like Heather Graham or Nicole Kidman.
 
Mrs.Toad said:
Then why use the term "legalize" when it's already legal in Missouri?

Maybe legalize is not the correct term?
It does admend the constitution to make it law.
 
I hate to bust ya'lls bubble, but there are already thousands of clones out there. They listen to Jim Rome everyday.
 
magicmato said:
And we are worried about cloning humans outside of the human bodies because....? What do you think they will do, put a cloned human embryo inside of a dog and bring it to term or something?

Talk about paranoia.

These things already happen
from wikipedia

In 2000, a cow named Bessie gave birth to a cloned Asian gaur, an endangered species, but the calf died after two days. In 2003, a banteng was successfully cloned, followed by three African wildcats from a thawed frozen embryo. These successes provided hope that similar techniques (using surrogate mothers of another species) might be used to clone extinct species. Anticipating this possibility, tissue samples from the last bucardo (Pyrenean Ibex) were frozen immediately after it died. Researchers are also considering cloning endangered species such as the giant panda, ocelot, and cheetah. The "Frozen Zoo" at the San Diego Zoo now stores frozen tissue from the world's rarest and most endangered species.[7][8]

In 2002, geneticists at the Australian Museum announced that they had replicated DNA of the Thylacine (Tasmanian Tiger), extinct about 65 years previous, using polymerase chain reaction.[9] However, on 2005-02-15 the museum announced that it was stopping the project after tests showed the specimens' DNA had been too badly degraded by the (ethanol) preservative. Most recently, on 2005-05-15, it was announced that the Thylacine project would be revived, with new participation from researchers in New South Wales and Victoria.

not paranoid...just not ill informed
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

GET A DISNEY VACATION QUOTE

Dreams Unlimited Travel is committed to providing you with the very best vacation planning experience possible. Our Vacation Planners are experts and will share their honest advice to help you have a magical vacation.

Let us help you with your next Disney Vacation!











facebook twitter
Top