I've read quite a few of his books, and I do think he makes some really good points. I don't get the impression AT ALL that he is promoting "get rich quick." He talks a lot about the concept that if you want to be wealthy, you need to research and learn the skills of accumulating wealth - things that are not taught in schools. He doesn't teach those skills in his books, but he does stress that you need to learn them. If you want to invest in real estate, you need to research enough to know what properties are good investments, what is going on in the market, etc. If you want to have your own business (which he highly recommends), you need to do the research to make that succeed. I know this is common sense, but to me it is the opposite of "get rich quick" - he's telling people to take the time to learn how to become wealthier.
One point he makes that I think is true: it is very hard to become wealthy if you are an employee in a corporation or organization. In that situation, you basically get paid for your time -and you only have a limited amount of time you can put into working. Investments, businesses you own (but where others work), etc., allow you to earn money while you are doing something else, and that's why you have more opportunity to get rich.
One thing I must say I didn't like - he's quite critical of people who chose jobs like teaching, social work, nursing, etc. because it is very difficult for these people to become rich. (His father started out as a teacher, and he is quite negative about his father.) To me, that misses the point - many people value the meaning of their work (helping others) more than the money they might bring home.
Teresa