That's adorable!
Anyway, one of the reasons your response interested me is because I was an only. So I can tell you a little about the dynamic in my home (though I obviously can't speak for the OP).
I have two kids and my husband sometimes says that we that if we'd had more than two, we wouldn't have been able to afford all the extras we paid for. Fewer trips to Disney. No saxophone for the boy. No dissection lessons for the girl. That sort of thing. And I do know that my attention was often split between the two of them, which meant sometimes one or the other got overlooked.
So, in theory, if we'd had one then that one child would have got even MORE opportunities to eat out at restaurants, more lessons, more trips, etc. More money, and more attention, too. We could have given that kid everything, without having to juggle the needs of other kids and without worries about whether we were being "fair".
However, having been an only, I can tell you that more is definitely not always better. I was the sole focus of all my mother's attention and worry. Every little thing I said or did was scrutinized and analyzed. My days were scheduled down to the half hour... when she was home. Because, she was a working single parent, so there were also long stretches of time when I was completely by myself. It was all or nothing, all the time. I asked Santa several years in a row to bring me a little sibling. I thought a baby would give my mum something else to focus on, that wasn't me!
I expect every family size has it's positive and negative aspects. But I deliberately chose to have more than one, due to my experience of being an only. Heck, I would have had more than two, if my husband had been on board for it.
