I totally understand what you are saying, but I think there is more to the debate than simply a black or white decsion. What if a family spends and will continue to spend say, $3,000 a year on Disney Hotels anyway? Now they don't borrow that annual vacation money, but they would have to borrow the $20k or whatever for a DVC contract purchase. In a case like this, I can see where borrowing might be a worthwhile idea in the long run. That money would be spent anyway each year, but with DVC it's also being invested in future vacations. After a certain number vacations, the amount of the initial purchase will have been "saved" and then subsequent vacation stays will come in at a very low price. In some situations, that is an acceptable value against the cost of financing.