FlightlessDuck
Y kant Donald fly?
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2006
WDW in 1971 --- MK. CR, Poly, and the monorail.
Too bad about tradition; too bad about the concepts that have resulted in today's WDW.
There were no Extra Magic Hours in 1971, either.
WDW in 1971 --- MK. CR, Poly, and the monorail.
Too bad about tradition; too bad about the concepts that have resulted in today's WDW.
Grand assertions - assertions of extreme scale and consequence - in the absence of reliable information, are wild leaps. I'm not sure what else could be considered wild leaps, actually.
Actually all I asserted was that maybe more folks would decide to check out the offsite bargains in light of EMH changes (monorail limitations and character elimination), thus affecting their ability to keep their rooms filled.
That's a "grand assertion" or "wild leap"? I actually find you labelling it as such to be a wild leap. Unless of course you have some sort of reliable metric to back it up.
I suppose that means you have no more access to reliable metrics on the topic than I do. So for you to say I'm making a "wild leap" is no more accurate than me making such a "wild leap" in the first place.
Or did you conduct some sort of market research on the topic already? No? Didn't hack into the Disney data base to see for yourself? Then this is ALL speculation. And opinion.
Bicker is correct. He doesn't need to provide proof, you do.
http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/burden-of-proof.html
To help you see where you might have gone wrong in your statement...
http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/burden-of-proof.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance
I have said that before, so your not the only one who has thought that.Monorail backups are no fun, my pet peeve is when they decide to load express guests on the resort trains at TTC, its simply unfair and wrong for all the resort guests who have to deal with over crowded trains.
Actually I think the though process was more like this:
Ok, we have to deal with the monorail maintenance we have been putting off. We are at the point where it is increasingly dangerous to operate the monorails as they are and we have to get in front of the issue. So, do we just close down the entire monorail system for <insert time here, probably around a year> and rely solely on buses and watercraft or find a way to increase the time when the tracks are free of trains so we can work on the maintenance issues one at a time?
Well, I think the later is the better option. There will be some guests who get their panties all in a wad over the decision but in reality the majority will either not know this isn't the normal policy or get over it when they realize we will increase the frequency of buses to the effected resorts and add a monorail loop bus for those who need to get from resort to resort along the line.
Now, we will have to add a disclaimer to the marketing literature for the monorail resorts indicating that while the monorail will be running for the vast majority of the time the parks are open there will be periods of time when that is not the case but we have made alternate travel available for them so they don't have to worry about finding their own alternative.
In the end I don't for see this negatively effecting our bottom line all that much while a guest death due to the monorail's current condition would. Seems like a no-brainer to me.
Make it so number two.
Just came across this post by Jason Garcia:
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/the-...world-monorail-hours-20110711,0,1288947.story
I am disappointed .I guess ,with not having the monorail "after hours" but what I found more distressing is how everyone is saying the monorail is in need of great repairs. Are the monorails safe? We are staying at a monorail resort and would be using the monorail quite often and although I'm not a huge fan of the ride(hate heights and claustrophobic) I usually just breathe through it. Now I'm a little nervous. Am I over reacting? I sure hope so.
Do you really think so? Do you truly think that the guests at four (out of 26) resorts needing to use alternate transportation is going to reduce EEMH attendance to such a great degree that WDW would cancel the perk altogether?
Just came across this post by Jason Garcia:
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/the-...world-monorail-hours-20110711,0,1288947.story
the reduced hours are "to accommodate for planned maintenance" on the trains, which are approximately 20 years old.
Disney said it has not yet decided whether it will operate the trains during extra ticketed events