This will undboubtedly generating a whole new Universal v. Disney debate. However, I'm very curious to know why the constructin timeline for PhilharMagic is so long. Legend of the Lion King closed in February of 2002 and development of Phil appeared to commence almost immediately. Yet, 14 months later there has been no mention of an opening. And, rumors have it set to go no earlier than the middle of the summer.
Yet, Universal shut down Hitchcock just shy of one year later than Disney stopped Legend, and Shrek is slated to quite possibly open BEFORE Mickey.
They are both 4-D shows, built on digital technology with in-theater effects. Heck, Universal has been hyping Shrek to be on-par with Terminator. That's quite a lofty claim to have to deliver on.
So, all this, of course, begs a couple of questions.
1) Is Mickey that much more advanced (and better) of a show?
or
2) Is there some reason that Disney is dragging its feet on this one?
Or is there some other explanation?