coopersmom
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2010
I agree that the abbreviations can be difficult at first, but by either persusing the previously noted link or simply by having been on the site for a short while, you really do pick them up.
And while I certainly appreciate that you are very comfortable working with numerous devices at a quick speed, please bear in mind that not everyone is as adept as you. BBB, DH, PP, etc. make it easier for those that post quite often, or for those that are slower typers. Part of getting used to any community is getting used to their existing way of doing things.
Again, I apologize for the off-topic response, and not this is NOT a knock against anyone in this forum or the "culture" I realize many treasure, just another perspective ...
It depends on your goal. If your goal is to provide, and be, the premiere resource of information that serves a larger Disney-interested community (everyone that comes across this site via any means), then as a graphic designer and professional writer I can attest that the only truly good way to go about that is to ditch the acronyms and abbreviations. Providing an instruction list of "how to read this forum," instead of just taking an extra tenth of a second to write what you mean, is definitely a stumbling block for participation and understanding for that wider audience. Many of whom may visit once, see all the hard-to-get lingo and never return, or even bother to ask a question, writing off the place and missing out on some very good info because of that.
I, too, work mainly within an industry that serves a niche community and we tend to speak in shorthand amongst ourselves. BUT when we are writing and publishing data, online or in print, acronymns and abbreviations must FIRST be spelled out in any instance they are used, even when we know we are speaking mostly to a core, insider audience. For instance, in this case, the first time you would need to write "Park Vue Inn (PVI)", but the next 10 times you cite it (within the same post), just "PVI" is acceptable. That makes it clear and simple to understand for anyone, be they newbie or vet.
Now, if the goal is to maintain a specific clique or exclusive club of posters and participants, valuing users based on their post count and/or ability to decipher a series of obscure acronyms/abbreviations, then the current way is preferable. Creating a learning curve or "hump" new users have to master if they wish to stick around and play (i.e. "post") with you, definitely ups the exclusivity of the forum.
I understand that, that may sound like a sarcastic way to explain it, but it's not intended as such. If that is what you are going for, that's a perfectly acceptable goal. Seeking out commitment and speaking only to a devoted almost fanatical core does not have to have a negative connotation. Limiting your audience by choice--making a newcomer learn the rules of the group as a means of providing proof their commitment to the subject matter--has its benefits as well.
Just my two cents and I'll leave it there.
To the original poster, good luck with your situation. I know it's something that really would ruin my vacation, no matter how hard I tried otherwise. Yikes!