TLSnell1981
Tiny bubbles... make me happy... make me feel fine
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2006
editing error
Last edited:
I'm quite aware, that you can't compare apples to oranges. I also know why, we pay more for less coverage...via premiums, copays, coinsurance, deductibles, etc.Did you read the posts about people who needed chemo therapy, then found their pre ACA insurance did not cover it. These are the types of things that Obamacare fixed. That could be part of the reason your insurance went up. There was a lot of junk insurance out there. You really can company's, not compare prices if you do not compare policies. BTW my data is from the US center of disease control and is official us data
My SIL just tried to go through affordable Care Act, but the cheapest policy was going to cost her $1400 a month with a $12,000 deductible. NO way could she afford that!!! She finally find a company called CompanionLife and went with their health insurance policy. It is going to cost her $700 a month and zero deductible. I don't know the entire details, but it was a relief she found something she could semi-afford.
The whole death panels thing would have cracked me up if people weren't so serious about it. Like I have time for ANOTHER meeting?Medicare reimbursement for doctor/patient end-of-life discussions = "death panels". Perfect example of why we can't have rational discussions about health care economics.
To put the ACA, which has significant benefits despite its flaws, ahead of lies like "Iraq has weapons of mass destruction" or "we need to forcibly incarcerate over 100,000 Japanese Americans for the safety of the country" is ludicrous.
I actually think high costs were an issue. They contended that by adding more insureds to the pool, everyone's rates would come down. Remember the promise that costs would decrease by $2500/year for the average family?
That was if a public option was available and if the exchange was at a federal level instead of a state level. Neither of those passed.
The goal of the current implementation of the ACA is to slow the increase of rates and insure more people... both of which has happened.
I must have missed the asterisk in all the speeches.
I must have missed the asterisk in all the speeches.
Perhaps next time you'll listen closer
More have been forced to purchase insurance. I hear, it's pretty great, as long as, they don't get sick. Well care usually has decent coverage....just don't get sick.The American Medical Association's official report is now in.
Conclusions and Relevance The ACA’s first 2 open enrollment periods were associated with significantly improved trends in self-reported coverage, access to primary care and medications, affordability, and health. Low-income adults in states that expanded Medicaid reported significant gains in insurance coverage and access compared with adults in states that did not expand Medicaid.
http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=2411283
I'm listening close...did it miss anything about the reducing premiums $2500? How about "If you like your insurance you can keep your insurance" The first letter I got from my BC/BS, first sentence, "your current policy is being cancelled due to the ACA. If does not meet guidelines." Uh, yes, I wasn't covered for maternity! Male, over 60...Thanks.No astericks.
What was promised:
20% huge improvement
80% no change
Reality:
20% various levels of improvement
40% no change
40% took it right up the bum
Me too!!I'm in the last 40%. Thanks ACA!