Lisa loves Pooh said:How old a child is irrelevant. That child is no longer a baby. And if they didn't wish to pay for the extra 3yo. They could have gone when the 3yo was 2 years, 11 months, 29 days.
Noone placed the OP in handcuffs and said..NOPE--you must wait until AFTER your child is 3yo.
We don't want to pay extra for our 3yo...we take her when she is 2. Problem solved.
OP's daughter's sleeping arrangements is NOT Disney or any other hotels problem for that matter.
I don't blame the hotel industry when I can't get a room with a king bed and have to get 2 queens when I know my kids will both end up in our bed. It is NOT their problem. It would be mine. I pay extra for the King--I find a hotel with a King availabe...if I am unwilling to pay or can't find a hotel with a King available..tough cookies for me and we have to cram into one queen sized bed.
Since when does how we rear our children and our sleeping habits become the problems of the hotel industry?
Of course, no one is handcuffing me or anyone else and forcing us to go to disney. Yes, we could stay home and hibernate once our youngest turns 3. I was merely wishing outloud that disney had some more affordable options for us. Is that so wrong? They addressed the affordable options for families of 4 by building the value resorts. These are simple hotels without all the perks of the mods and deluxes for families that still want to be onsite but can't afford all the bells and whistles. Families of five are still forced to pay for the perks of a moderate (POR), or pay for two rooms at a value. We actually like the values but can't stay there with five unless we pay double.
I am all for paying for my FAIR share for an extra child. I just don't think that $100 a night for that extra child is really a fair share. I grew up in a family of 5 and when we travelled my parents were always able to get a roll-away cot for my brother (the youngest) for an extra $5 a night and we could stay in one room. Of course, with inflation, this would be more than $5 today, but to me that was fair way to handle an extra person. I know that many blame it on fire codes, but how does a baby not count toward the fire code, but a 3 yr old or older does?
I was excited to find out that they were building the family suites at the values, until finding out that they would cost more than renting two rooms. I don't see how the suites have helped anyone?
While we would love to stay at a deluxe, it just isn't in the budget, and quite frankly, we don't spend enough time in our room to make it worth spending $250 and up each night just for a room. We also aren't going to break the disney rules by sneaking 5 in a 4 person room, so once our youngest turns 3, we will have to stay off site where many hotels do allow 5 in a room for a slight surcharge. I just wish that disney had an option for us that wasn't ridiculously priced. They have affordable options for families of 4 so I don't see why it is so crazy that families of 5 would want something affordable as well. I'm not saying that we shouldn't pay something for our fifth, I just can't see buying her her own separate room.