FredinFL
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2011
Shouldn't we start calling them "deathers" now?
Shouldn't we start calling them "deathers" now?
Agree with this. It seems that no matter what happens it's a polarizing event instead of an uniting event. And if you don't believe the government, there is absolutely no way you're ever going to be 100% convinced no matter what they show you. I think they respected the Muslim faith by disposing of the body quickly but disrespected Osama by not allowing any kind of shrine to exist around his burial place.It only took a few moments for the conspiracies to begin. Needed election points, did it to get back at Trump...it's really sad when we can't come together for a few hours without all the back biting and nonsense. I'm so sick of being surrounded by all the conspiracies. Everyone has their own agenda. There is no such thing as for the good of all anymore.
Seriously? What were they supposed to do, knock on the door and ask him to come out? There was no way there would NOT be a battle, and we would not be holding back. Who says they didn't get a picture? I'm sure there's plenty of documentation. Just because it's not being shown to the public doesn't mean it doesn't exist.There is EVERY reason to believe he's still alive??? And Bin Laden wasn't THE terrorist. How incredibly stupid do you think our government and others are that they would relax security because we got him??? If anything, I'm sure everyone is on much higher alert, in anticipation of retaliation.
Pictures, DNA results, eyewitness accounts...there are going to be some people out there who will never accept ANY of it, unless they themselves did an autopsy and the DNA testing.
They announced this morning on the news that his sister died of cancer and Boston and they kept her brain after death (which I find gross). Don't know if that's true, just repeating what I heard this morning.
Do you REALLY think that the government is 100% truthful in everything they say??? It makes a lot of sense, especially if they captured him vs killing him. All I am saying is that if they really did kill him, why not offer up some proof other than a press conference saying we killed him and we have DNA. As for it being a more dangerous time--sure for the next couple weeks or so. When nothing happens, people will start to relax. Not that you will see that in the military or even at airports, etc. but individuals will become less aware as time goes on.
Do you REALLY think that the government is 100% truthful in everything they say??? It makes a lot of sense, especially if they captured him vs killing him. All I am saying is that if they really did kill him, why not offer up some proof other than a press conference saying we killed him and we have DNA. As for it being a more dangerous time--sure for the next couple weeks or so. When nothing happens, people will start to relax. Not that you will see that in the military or even at airports, etc. but individuals will become less aware as time goes on.
Well, a body for one. Like I said earlier-it's just too convenient that he was "buried at sea". They could ALWAYS have done that later. Yes, they say they have DNA-and when you throw out those letters, people assume that can't be wrong-but like I said, where did they get the previous samples to compare this one to?? How about some information about that? Yes, photos can be faked and just releasing a photo would still not convince me he is actually dead for that reason. I see no reason that they could not have brought his body somewhere, gotten outside confirmation from several different countries and released the DNA information as proof they have actually killed him--THEN dump his body at sea.
Well, a body for one. Like I said earlier-it's just too convenient that he was "buried at sea". They could ALWAYS have done that later. Yes, they say they have DNA-and when you throw out those letters, people assume that can't be wrong-but like I said, where did they get the previous samples to compare this one to?? How about some information about that? Yes, photos can be faked and just releasing a photo would still not convince me he is actually dead for that reason. I see no reason that they could not have brought his body somewhere, gotten outside confirmation from several different countries and released the DNA information as proof they have actually killed him--THEN dump his body at sea.
Seriously? What were they supposed to do, knock on the door and ask him to come out? There was no way there would NOT be a battle, and we would not be holding back. Who says they didn't get a picture? I'm sure there's plenty of documentation. Just because it's not being shown to the public doesn't mean it doesn't exist.There is EVERY reason to believe he's still alive??? And Bin Laden wasn't THE terrorist. How incredibly stupid do you think our government and others are that they would relax security because we got him??? If anything, I'm sure everyone is on much higher alert, in anticipation of retaliation.
Pictures, DNA results, eyewitness accounts...there are going to be some people out there who will never accept ANY of it, unless they themselves did an autopsy and the DNA testing.
So, if this is true, why not just say this in the press conference last night??? This is exactly my point--this isn't a "state secret" is it if his sister died of cancer here?? They could have easily said "we have DNA from OBL's sister, who died I Boston in whatever year and have compared that DNA to OBL's and have a 99% match" or whatever. They could have held up a chart showing the match even, but I still think a body to go along with all of this would have been a good idea too.
Yes, it was. So are you saying that you need to see OBL's body to believe that he was killed? Would a photo do? Or do you need to see it in person to believe he was dead?The question on this thread is "Do you want to/need to see Bin Laden's Body'.....
What's so HILARIOUS about what robinb said? Wow. Do I think the government is 100% truthful? No. I also think that they're not about to say to the country "Psst, everyone...here's the scoop...don't tell anyone".
Do you REALLY think that the government is 100% truthful in everything they say??? It makes a lot of sense, especially if they captured him vs killing him. All I am saying is that if they really did kill him, why not offer up some proof other than a press conference saying we killed him and we have DNA. As for it being a more dangerous time--sure for the next couple weeks or so. When nothing happens, people will start to relax. Not that you will see that in the military or even at airports, etc. but individuals will become less aware as time goes on.
Because it's not necessary to offer that much detail in a PRESS CONFERENCE by THE PRESIDENT, at 11:30 PM on a Sunday night. Or ever. Yeah, I can just picture Obama doing a powerpoint presentation on all of this when announcing it. He made the announcement, he gave the primary details. Now come the questions and additional information from the press and the government...where'd they get the DNA? His sister's brain. Question asked and answered.So, if this is true, why not just say this in the press conference last night??? This is exactly my point--this isn't a "state secret" is it if his sister died of cancer here?? They could have easily said "we have DNA from OBL's sister, who died I Boston in whatever year and have compared that DNA to OBL's and have a 99% match" or whatever. They could have held up a chart showing the match even, but I still think a body to go along with all of this would have been a good idea too.
Do I need to see it...Yes..I do...I am not able to just "accept" and move on...I need facts and proof. Call me a consiparcy theorist or whatever...Just because it was said on CNN etc..does not make it law..
The buried at sea thing makes me wonder even more...We could have buried him anywhere to prevent a shrine...but less than 24hrs later, and the body is already gone...
You got one right! But no, conversations NEVER stray, in person or on the Internet. The topic of seeing the body naturally progressed to "proof" and that's what people are discussing.The question on this thread is "Do you want to/need to see Bin Laden's Body'.....
Because it leaves no proof to anyone that he is actually dead. They "say" they have DNA evidence--but what are they comparing the DNA too-where did they get the first DNA sample to prove it is really him? It's just a little too convenient to say, "yeah, we killed him and dumped his body at sea." We all know that our government is 100% truthful all the time though . FOr something this big there should have been outside confirmation, photos, just more proof.
The question on this thread is "Do you want to/need to see Bin Laden's Body'.....