chloelovesdisney
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2007
My local hospital thankfully has a nursery, and I was quite happy to make use of it at night and during the day to shower and nap.
Maybe a mother that is ill or in severe pain? You can't paint everyone with the same judgmental brush.My kids are older-14 and 16, but they did encourage rooming in.
I couldn't imagine not wanting the baby with you 24/7. What kind of mother doesn't want her baby with her the entire time?
So I had baby number one with me 24/7.
No sleep. I went home totally exhausted. Like more tired than I have ever been in my life. I woke up 7am in a Saturday, went into labor that night, so awake all night,had her Sunday afternoon, slept maybe 2 hours Sunday night, and maybe 2-3 hours Monday night. Home Tuesday afternoon.
Baby number 2, sent him off to the nursery to sleep both nights. AND asked for them to feed him.
So I nursed him at midnight, they fed him at 3am, and they brought him to me for the 6am feeding and I kept him the rest of the day.
I'll be honest, I wanted them to keep him until 9am.
Regardless, I came home well rested.
That lasted about 24 hours.
Maybe a mother that is ill or in severe pain? You can't paint everyone with the same judgmental brush.
LOL, did you stop reading after that sentence? Read the rest, I was being sarcastic.Maybe a mother that is ill or in severe pain? You can't paint everyone with the same judgmental brush.
Yes, thank you!Did you read the rest of her post? I don't think she meant to be judgemental - I think she just meant that was her naive thinking with her first. By her second, she says she used the nursery!
Babies are not quiet sleepers, and even with my last babies (4 and 5), it took a while in the beginning to determine if baby was just fussing during sleep, or getting hungry. That is the main reason why I didn't have my babies sleep in my room, or use monitors at night. New moms jump at the smallest peep.If they are in your room then you wouldn't be able to go to the bathroom or get a shower unless someone was in the room with you. When I had my kids, I would send the baby to the nursery when I was ready to go to bed and wouldn't ask for the nurse to bring them in until I got myself ready in the morning. Just easier.
Geez, it seems like "baby-friendly" is another way to say "we hate new moms".
If you don't have someone to help you and you're in one of these hands off hospitals how do you even shower? I couldn't wait to shower afterward.
If they are in your room then you wouldn't be able to go to the bathroom or get a shower unless someone was in the room with you. When I had my kids, I would send the baby to the nursery when I was ready to go to bed and wouldn't ask for the nurse to bring them in until I got myself ready in the morning. Just easier.
The baby-friendly approach is based on a considerable amount of research, it's not about "hating new moms" or saving money. Keeping mothers and babies together is just one part of it, but it's an important part. The baby-friendly hospitals I am aware of (in Ontario, Canada) do have options for special situations where the mother isn't able to care for her baby because of birth complications or exhaustion or other issues. But for normal situations, mothers and babies are kept together.Geez, it seems like "baby-friendly" is another way to say "we hate new moms".