U2_rocks!
<font color=coral>The DISer formerly known as U2_r
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2006
Everyone talks about the "pain" aspect and cites examples of not getting a tooth pulled or a surgical procedure done without anaesthesia. That wasn't where my mind was at all when I made the decision not to have epidurals or any pain relief. I had 2 reasons for wanting drug-free births that really don't apply to the tooth pulling scenario:
1. When I was pregnant I was somewhat careful about what I put in my body because so many things do cross the placenta and affect the baby. I might get a tooth pulled with local pain relief, but I would not have elected to have any kind of surgery with a general anaesthetic unless it had been an emergency. An injection of novocaine in the gum sufficient to numb it long enough to fill a cavity or pull a tooth might have been considered safe enough, but a needle in the spine pumping much stronger pain meds into the spinal cavity would not have been a choice I would make unless my life were at risk. If I knew my baby would be out a few minutes after the pain meds were administered I guess it would be fine, but sometimes babies are in there for hours after the epidural (getting some of the effects of the drug). I was not comfortable with that.
2. If you have a fully "natural" birth, and by that I mean one that utilizes the woman's own body as much as possible and only keeps medical help on standby, you cannot have an epidural. This is because, due to the many potential risks of an epidural, medical help has to actually be given, not just be on standby. I am talking about constant monitoring by machine, IV fluids, other drugs if needed to counter-act an unwanted reaction to the epi drugs, meds to control blood pressure if it goes out of whack etc. I had none of these for my 3 natural births. If you have a childbirth practitioner with you who is accustomed to childbirth without machines, they know what to look for in terms of things going wrong. They can then use the full spectrum of medical help if warranted. That's the sort of birth I wanted, and I did my research and talked to the OB/midwives a lot in advance so that I understood the whole process well. I could not have had that sort of "active" birth with an epidural. At all times we kept the baby's safety in mind, and we had back-up plans and equipment on hand in case anything went wrong. I was in no way against medical procedures - I just didn't want them for a birth that was obviously progressing just fine on its own.
Yes childbirth hurt like hell, especially the back labour I had with my first! But I had goals that were separate from the pain management issue, and they were more important to me than my own comfort. I don't consider that to be "crazy".
1. When I was pregnant I was somewhat careful about what I put in my body because so many things do cross the placenta and affect the baby. I might get a tooth pulled with local pain relief, but I would not have elected to have any kind of surgery with a general anaesthetic unless it had been an emergency. An injection of novocaine in the gum sufficient to numb it long enough to fill a cavity or pull a tooth might have been considered safe enough, but a needle in the spine pumping much stronger pain meds into the spinal cavity would not have been a choice I would make unless my life were at risk. If I knew my baby would be out a few minutes after the pain meds were administered I guess it would be fine, but sometimes babies are in there for hours after the epidural (getting some of the effects of the drug). I was not comfortable with that.
2. If you have a fully "natural" birth, and by that I mean one that utilizes the woman's own body as much as possible and only keeps medical help on standby, you cannot have an epidural. This is because, due to the many potential risks of an epidural, medical help has to actually be given, not just be on standby. I am talking about constant monitoring by machine, IV fluids, other drugs if needed to counter-act an unwanted reaction to the epi drugs, meds to control blood pressure if it goes out of whack etc. I had none of these for my 3 natural births. If you have a childbirth practitioner with you who is accustomed to childbirth without machines, they know what to look for in terms of things going wrong. They can then use the full spectrum of medical help if warranted. That's the sort of birth I wanted, and I did my research and talked to the OB/midwives a lot in advance so that I understood the whole process well. I could not have had that sort of "active" birth with an epidural. At all times we kept the baby's safety in mind, and we had back-up plans and equipment on hand in case anything went wrong. I was in no way against medical procedures - I just didn't want them for a birth that was obviously progressing just fine on its own.
Yes childbirth hurt like hell, especially the back labour I had with my first! But I had goals that were separate from the pain management issue, and they were more important to me than my own comfort. I don't consider that to be "crazy".