Can someone explain in simple terms what has happened in banking tonight?

Discussion in 'Budget Board' started by Disneycrazymom, Mar 16, 2008.

  1. Disneycrazymom

    Disneycrazymom DIS Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2001
    Messages:
    5,492
    I have read some here and am watching City of Money on CNBC. I don't understand how the 1 company can affect the whole system? I thought there would be systems in place to keep the financial's separate enough that 1 failure would not cause them all to fall. Thanks in advance!
     
  2. Avatar

    Google AdSense Guest Advertisement


    to hide this advert.
  3. Youarehere

    Youarehere <font color=blue>For ha-ha's, Dad would do a break

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2007
    Messages:
    1,869
  4. Fizzgig

    Fizzgig Enjoy your travels, wherever they take you! May th

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2007
    Messages:
    1,827
    Here's a comprehensive article to try and give you the whole picture: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3683270/

    When the 5th largest investment bank goes under (the choice was between declaring bankruptcy or getting bought out at $2/share--a pittance, and Bear Stearns may still be overpriced), that causes massive ripples.

    The reason Bear Stearns went under is being bandied about as mortgages were no longer getting paid by high credit risk homeowners. As in, when the loans were made, the people buying the houses should have been denied due to their credit history, income, etc.; not that they had one major medical claim and went under, and prior to the loan they were fine.

    Last week, Bear Stearns was worth Billions. This week, they are worth $236 million.

    Hope that helps!
     
  5. PatsMom

    PatsMom <font color=blue>Sometimes has Dory moments!<br><f

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2000
    Messages:
    5,691
    One of the things that has happened is that JP Morgan probably bought the bargain of the century.
     
  6. shelly3girls

    shelly3girls <a href="http://www.wdwinfo.com/dis-sponsor/index.

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2002
    Messages:
    3,512
    Along with the lawsuit they are going to have to fight...:eek:
     
  7. breezy1077

    breezy1077 <font color=green><marquee behavior=alternate>Eat

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2008
    Messages:
    7,609
    I keep saying call your congressmen and put a stop to the mortgage witchhunt! This isn't the first investor to drop (but it is the biggest) and it won't be the last. There's been such a hit to the mortgage industry that everyone now needs to sit back and let the dust settle. Instead they keep kicking the industry when it's down and the ripple effect is going to hurt everone. Everyone! The housing market affects so many other financial sectors. So, again...

    Call your congressmen!!!!!!!!!!!!
     
  8. Toby'sFriend

    Toby'sFriend The thing about growing up with Fred and George is

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2001
    Messages:
    7,420
    I'm not quite clear on what further actions you expect our Government to take.


    They've already meddled quite a bit.
     
  9. mikehn

    mikehn DIS Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2008
    Messages:
    2,484
    On Thursday, Bear Stearns got a margin call, basically, creditors came calling for their money. Most of Bear's liquid assets are mortgage backed securities, which are currently worth little to nothing. Since Bear was not able to sell their mortgage backed securities to raise cash, they could not satisfy their margin call. Thus on Friday, their stock tanked. Unable to raise any cash, it was apparent by Friday evening, they were on the verge of collapse. A collapse would cause catastrophic ripples through the world financial markets as every creditor, in fear, would be issuing margin calls to their banks. Individuals would rush out to their banks and pull their money out, which is essentially a margin call. And you can imagine the domino effect.
     
  10. PatsMom

    PatsMom <font color=blue>Sometimes has Dory moments!<br><f

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2000
    Messages:
    5,691
    Lawsuit from who? Bear Stearns investors? They have no right to sue because the company they invested in was sold at a fire sale price. They'll get some JP Morgan stock. Bond holders also can't sue unless there was fraud involved and I haven't seen any allegations of that. Bad investment decisions perhaps but not fraud. Investors withdrew $17 billion in two days. The more money withdrawn, the greater the panic among investors. Bear Stearns did not have the liquidity to pay out so they sold out. The Fed is guaranteeing their most questionable investements so JP Morgan's risk is minimal. What they are paying for Bear is less than the value of Bear Stearns real estate. Bear Stearns is the larges underwriter of mortgage backed bonds in the industry - it was just too big for the government to let fail. The crisis of confidence in banks and investment houses would have crippled the economy. And Bear Stearns was in a position where they really had to agree to the buyout to restore investor confidence.
     
  11. breezy1077

    breezy1077 <font color=green><marquee behavior=alternate>Eat

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2008
    Messages:
    7,609
    That's my point exactly! I'm telling everyone to tell congress to back off. Right now they are only legislating more of a problem. Every week we hear of more and more proposed legislation....enough already. It's like beating a dead horse. I've said this from the beginning of the mortgage meltdown last year - Brace yourselves! The housing market affects everything. Hate to be doom and gloom, but...anyone else thinking depression?
     
  12. punkin

    punkin <font color=purple>Went through pain just to look

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2001
    Messages:
    11,986
    There are always lawsuits in this type of situation.
     
  13. paulh

    paulh <font color=blue>likes to have a beer<br><font col

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 1999
    Messages:
    5,512
    in fact it`s zero as everthing is covered by the fed
    Paulh
     
  14. MsStinkerBelle

    MsStinkerBelle Hittin' WDW Since Space Mountain was 'Coming Soon'

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2006
    Messages:
    2,491
    Some co-workers and I were saying this exact same thing.
     
  15. paulh

    paulh <font color=blue>likes to have a beer<br><font col

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 1999
    Messages:
    5,512
    as in the case of northen rock (UK bank) shareholders are taking government to court over natonalisation. And rocks problems were a fraction of bear sterns
    Paulh
     
  16. Lisa_M

    Lisa_M DIS Veteran

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2006
    Messages:
    2,480
    What am I supposed to say when I call? :confused3

    ETA: nm, I saw what you wrote. I don't think staying out of it will help the situation. I don't know much about finance, but it seems that the government doing what it can to save our economy is the best course of action. But then again, the only finance class I took was accounting in high school...
     
  17. PatsMom

    PatsMom <font color=blue>Sometimes has Dory moments!<br><f

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2000
    Messages:
    5,691
    In the US for a shareholder suit to succeed on the basis of fraudulent business practices (including violation of securities laws) the facts must be "cogent and compelling" in proving that the company had an intent to defraud investors. The is probably going to rule out any shareholder suits since I haven't read anything to indicate allegations that BSC was "cooking the books" like Enron and Worldcom were. Marking to market and valuing mortgage securities is a tough call these days. What is selling is going at fire sale prices because of the overall market jitters in that sector. And high quality securities are being trashed along with junk. Shareholders might try to block the sale to force a higher price but it is likely that it will go through anyhow. 30% of all shares are employee owned - they won't try to block the sale as their jobs would definitely be lost if the bank went under. The SEC has said nothing and if they had any intentions of looking into BSC's accounting practices, I think they would have spoken up by now.

    JP Morgan got a bargain. One of the reasons for the bargain price though is that they did not have time to do a proper job of due diligence on the acquisition so they are offering a low price. A couple of analysts I've read have mentioned that although BSC was the largest underwriter in the mortgage bond business before their collapse, that segment is basically worthless now. What JPM is interested in is the prime brokerage business. Another interesting item I read is that when BSC put out feelers on the sale the only two who showed up were JPM and a private equity firm. Since the private equity firm would never have gotten government support, JPM won the bid by default. JPM does still have some risk but its pretty well hedged by the fed guaranteeing the potentially riskiest investments.

    This thinking is borne out by the markets behavior today. As a group financial stocks are down significantly as there is some speculation over who will fail next. JP Morgan is up significantly. Still way off its 52-week high but up quite a bit from Friday.

    Edited to add - I stand corrected on litigation - JP Morgan evidently does anticipate some litigation. I did find one article in a UK newspaper talking about it when I went looking

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/feedarticle?id=7391831

    Evidently shareholders are looking for lawyers willing to file lawsuits - the question then becomes will the suits go anywhere?
     
  18. DVC Sadie

    DVC Sadie <font color=royalblue>Those mashed taters are soun

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2006
    Messages:
    4,799
    I wonder who will be next? BS will not be the only company to be worth pennies on ther dollar before all of this shakes out.
     
  19. PatsMom

    PatsMom <font color=blue>Sometimes has Dory moments!<br><f

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2000
    Messages:
    5,691
    Morningstar did an interesting piece on which would be the next investment bank to fail. I think it is available to all at www.morningstar.com - I have a premium subscription because of my job. It was very well done.
     
  20. DVC Sadie

    DVC Sadie <font color=royalblue>Those mashed taters are soun

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2006
    Messages:
    4,799

    Thank you for the link, very interesting reading.
     
  21. paulh

    paulh <font color=blue>likes to have a beer<br><font col

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 1999
    Messages:
    5,512
    The only diffrance betwen Rock and BSC,rock was a lending bank to the public,thus having a run on it where people waited in line for days to draw money out.In BSC case there run on its funds was instituanal as they had no public outlets.
    If you had folks waiting in line for there money it would have felt much worse
    Paulh
     

Share This Page