I think that she meant that Sojourner Truth was black and female, not gay. But I could be wrong.
Oops I'm sorry . Duh me again!
I think that she meant that Sojourner Truth was black and female, not gay. But I could be wrong.
If we are to point out the sexuality of every person or nobody who achieves something great, what have we achieved? However, if we only focus on discussing the sexuality of homosexuals in this context - well, we achieve something different. That is what I mean. The wording of the bill isn't important. The intent is pretty clear. I amnot sure that it is good for anyone who believes that we are all created equal.
I do, if the focus is on them being gay. So many many gay Americans have done great things. They are acknowledged for their great things. Why bring their sexuality into it? To show that "Gay folks have done great things, too'. ?? Isn't that a given?
Oops I'm sorry . Duh me again!
This proves my point in my own mind. I never knew Sojourner Truth was gay until just this minute. And you know what, it makes no difference to me whatsoever. What she DID is the tremendous thing in history. The only thing it means to me finding out today that she was gay is oh wow, she was gay? Only because someone chose to mention it. Otherwise, meaningless to me.
This I can understand.
Maybe to understand ya woulda had to live a life of bein' told ya ain't normal, you're an aberration 'n unworthy (as in not fit for the military) or you shouldn't be allowed to marry, have children, live where you want, hold a job as a teacher.
I think it's very hard for the majority (straight or caucasian) to understand how that feels because it never, ever enters their mind but if you're gay or a minority, it's a constant message.
So let's just say Sojourner Truth was gay, you said it's meaningless to you, but what do you think it would mean to a young black lesbian?
That's the crux of the argument, none of this may mean anythin' to you, but for young gays 'n lesbians to learn that other gays have accomplished certain things might make all the difference to them.
Maybe to understand ya woulda had to live a life of bein' told ya ain't normal, you're an aberration 'n unworthy (as in not fit for the military) or you shouldn't be allowed to marry, have children, live where you want, hold a job as a teacher.
I think it's very hard for the majority (straight or caucasian) to understand how that feels because it never, ever enters their mind but if you're gay or a minority, it's a constant message.
I tried to convey this sentiment on another thread. Even though gay history means nothing to me, I would be a hypocrite if I said that it shouldn't be taught. As a black man, to me, black history is important. Who am I to say that a large percentage of the population shouldn't have their history taught. BUT, on the other hand, where does it stop? Do we teach Mexican American history?
So let's just say Sojourner Truth was gay, you said it's meaningless to you, but what do you think it would mean to a young black lesbian?
That's the crux of the argument, none of this may mean anythin' to you, but for young gays 'n lesbians to learn that other gays have accomplished certain things might make all the difference to them.
Maybe to understand ya woulda had to live a life of bein' told ya ain't normal, you're an aberration 'n unworthy (as in not fit for the military) or you shouldn't be allowed to marry, have children, live where you want, hold a job as a teacher.
I tried to convey this sentiment on another thread. Even though gay history means nothing to me, I would be a hypocrite if I said that it shouldn't be taught. As a black man, to me, black history is important. Who am I to say that a large percentage of the population shouldn't have their history taught. BUT, on the other hand, where does it stop? Do we teach Mexican American history?
tHIS IS WHERE i AGREE 1005 WITH YOU. I WANT THE KIDS TO FEEL THE TRUTH THAT THERES NOTHING ABNORMAL ABOUT THEM.
I'M SORRY, MY CAP LOCK IS STUCK ALL OF A SUDDEN.
I'm in Texas, Darlin', we teach Mexican American history.
Born, bred, and raised in New Mexico darlin'. And we already do.
The title of this thread threw me a little as I find the term gay history a little bit odd. I'm gay but not particularly "proud" (no more than I'm "proud" of being human ) and I always find discussions like these interesting.
I'm of the opinion that if an important historical figure is gay you could mention it in the same way you would perhaps mention sex, religion, nationality or general background information. I like the point about FDR - his disability wasn't important, the fact that it was hidden is more important.
Oh I completely understand the sentiment from that respect. I'm 20 and British so my upbringing is about as far removed from 1960s Texas as one could imagine I'm sure!You musta missed the shame on you lesson some gays got growin' up.
Back in 1967 when I was discharged from the Texas State Hospital for the Insane, my psychiatrist said it was okay to be gay, just don't tell anybody about it.
I hope that explains why some of us are proud.
this has to be the dumbest thing ever.
Who cares what the sexual orientation is of someone-relating to their accomplishments?
Oh I completely understand the sentiment from that respect. I'm 20 and British so my upbringing is about as far removed from 1960s Texas as one could imagine I'm sure!