Blue Zoo or Flying Fish for

[Paulines]

Non fish/seafood eaters in our party?Both menus are fairly thin on the beef/chicken apps & entrees it seems? Whose steak is better?

 

[3 Hobbits 2 Disney]

We were underwhelmed with Blue Zoo last May - food was meh, though service was good. I would recommend Flying Fish. The New York strip is reliable; I can’t speak to the chicken.

 

[TreAntDeu]

Flying Fish steak(and fish) was far better. But Blue Zoo was very good.

Ate at both in the last 6 months.

Boardwalk has more to see and do before/after dinner as well.

 

[DisneyWishes14]

They are both good, but I would have to give Flying Fish the edge on the steak. My DS had the filet there last year and it was fantastic!

 

[Paulines]

Thank you! I’ve been anxious to try FF, so I’m happy to hear their steak is good.

 

[auntfrannie]

I agree with FF. BZ was great the first time I tried it but the second visit was a bit lackluster. I've never had a bad meal at FF.

 

[smcabee]

Personally, Im not a fan of either steak. I would go to Shulas. Not only are their steaks fantastic to please the meat lovers, they also have excellent seafood as well.

 

[gharter]

For just Seafood, we find BlueZoo much better, although we have never had a bad meal at Flying Fish.
If you have non seafood people with you, definitely do Flying Fish.

 

[Paulines]

Shulas is on the agenda, but I’m kind of still undecided whether I want to drop $400 on one dinner

FF is now also on the list, thanks for the advice!

 

[Dean Marino]

Deleted

 

[Paulines]

Dean, DD has been in the restaurant biz for many years, I totally get and appreciate what you are saying!

 

[Super 27]

I'd go with Flying Fish. The food and service are excellent, and I really like the atmosphere. Plus, there's tons to do at Boardwalk before/after dinner.