LockShockBarrel
Pudge controls the weather.
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2009
One night we went to dinner at Cape May Cafe. We saw a father son pair eating plate, after plate, after plate of clams. Their table was covered with plates of empty shells, plates of full shells, and the sheen of butter across the entire table was enough for an elf to skate on. They were literally eating so many clams, that no one else could get any - The moment they saw a chef bring more to the buffet table, they would run up there, and take about 45% each. They were competing against each other to see who could out-eat who, and had a count going on the paper table cloth. I can't remember what it was at, but around 500+ per person. It was truly disgusting, and though they ate everything AT the actual restaurant, it was obscene, and way more food (even though they were tiny little clams) than anyone ever needed.
So my question is; Are these people on the "good side" of Santa's list, or are they on the "naughty list" along with the person who took the extra cookies?
And just to add - If the woman who took the cookies in a cloth napkin was staying on property, I was think that she would leave it in her hotel room. So that means that Disney would get their napkin back. Of course this is pure speculation, just a though.
Disgusting, but within the rules. I'd file this with the people that yell at their kids in public but at least they're paying attention rather than letting their child run around like a bat out of hell then yelling at an employee when said child knocks down a beer display and gets splashed with it (can anyone guess what I dealt with tonight? Come on..anyone )
In that situation, I would have thought maybe their server or someone would approach them and say something like "I'm so glad you're enjoying those clams. If you're still looking for more, maybe we could bring some to your table for you and then other people can try them from the buffet and they'll get to enjoy them too!" All smiles, not encouraging but not scolding. Yeah they'd probably be too self involved to notice the dig but it'd be worth a shot. This is the approach I take with people at my work and had I worked at the buffet where the great cookie caper took place and noticed this, I probably would have said the same type of thing. "Ma'am I can wrap a couple of those up to go for you if you'd like" or something to that effect (assuming the buffet was ok with food walking out)
It doesn't have to be this black and white ridiculousness of you steal therefore you're awful and should be punished. I don't see any way you can slice this story where it puts a positive spin on it for her kids.
1)She didn't ask and assumed she'd be told "No cookies for you" and felt the need to take them in front of her children = we can take stuff and hide it and all will be well.
2)She asked and was told "no" but took them anyway = We asked which is good, but we didn't like the answer so we did what we wanted anyway
3)She didn't think to ask but still thought what she was doing was wrong according to how OP said she was behaving = We're doing something bad but as long as no one sees us, it's ok.
so on and so forth. Really it doesn't matter if you see a rule or law as silly or stupid or needless, they exist for a reason.