If this is true (and i'm not saying it's not true, I can totally see where it would be true), does anyone know why the heck school districts insist on sending 4yo's to K??? It irks me to no end that they think kids should start regular school at 4yo. I can't imagine why this ever started. Maybe all districts were by calendar year, not school year (meaning dec 31), then some districts realized too many kids were 4yo in K and shouldn't be there, so they started pushing the cut-off date back? (my dd was 4yo in K and i considered holding, but didn't, but I wished the date was for the beginning of the school year so she'd be 5 starting K without me having to "hold" her back - our cut off is Nov 30, she's Oct 10 bday).
I've heard the answer "well, someone has to be the youngest"... but youngest at 4yo??? Why not youngest at 5yo? All kids should be 5yo entering K, but school districts need to change their cut off dates so parents don't have to do this type of wavering (should we send or shouldn't we?) It creates so many problems on both sides of the fence.
Anyway, just curious about how this all started...