Gumbo4x4
Note to the ladies who forgot to
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2012
He's a jerk, plain and simple.
I bet he got his butt whooped a lot in school
He's a jerk, plain and simple.
In this specific case, the restaurant owner's first response was an apology and said he'd update the menu along with emailing out a new updated menu. The very next day he emailed the customer to let him know that the old menu was no longer on the website. It doesn't seem like the restaurant was out to scam people. Just an honest mistake.
I bet he got his butt whooped a lot in school
http://www.businessinsider.com/ben-...harged-for-chinese-food-2014-12#ixzz3LRlQc05V
Refunding less than the overcharge was only about the fifth offer made - by this person who claims no control over the Brookline Village location.
To me, asking for triple damages was extreme. I understand it is allowable under the law but for $4, it comes across as being an ***. We all know there is a difference between being right under the law and being right in popular view. He falls into the former category. He also
I clicked on his link about his past claims and I didn't see one that was overcharged as much as mislabeled (even though the mislabeling was deliberate).
He seems to be trying to say that he was just standing up for the little guy and we should all applaud him for it.
kamik86, I have seen plenty of out of date websites. I use ADP for payroll and for weeks after Thanksgiving they still had an announcement about Thanksgiving hours. ADP has its own IT people and it seems like it should have been taken down but wasn't.
"Edelman replied that he had "already referred this matter to applicable authorities in order to attempt to compel your restaurant to identify all consumers affected and to provide refunds to all of them, or in any event to assure that an appropriate sanction is applied as provided by law."
It also sounds like he wants to start a class action suit against the restaurant. My company is involved in one and we had similar language used against us
.
I think it happens a lot, where consumers are "cheated" out of a few bucks here and a few bucks there.
Tempting to give this guy his four bucks just to make him go away but he does make some good points.
Harvard Business School Professor Goes to War Over $4 Worth of Chinese Food
What would you have done in the same circumstances?
Edelman - the person almost everyone is insulting - listed both the menu prices and tge actual prices in his initial e-mail. There's exactly $1 difference in each case, with the menu price always being lower.The amount of the overcharge has never been verified. So one could be rounding up to $4 while the other rounded down to $3.
Agreed. Even without the menu, it's a very well-done website. It's completely reasonable for a customer to expect it to be accurate. The Baldwin Bar website still lists the shredded chicken at $10.50.Agreed. As I said wouldn't have taken things nearly this far. Would have been happy with my $4. However I just don't get why businesses are so bad at this. Its not like websites are a new thing.
So you only care about you. He's also concerned about the potentially numerous customers who've also been overcharged.My time is worth more than $4 - that jerk needs a life!
I doubt he cared one bit about anyone else. He was miffed and was going to use his education and perceived status to bully the "little guy." I'm glad it failed so miserably.So you only care about you. He's also concerned about the potentially numerous customers who've also been overcharged.
LOL!! Good one, Art.Seems like your average Dis person.