HWY20RIDE4MYSON Mouseketeer Joined May 20, 2012 Jun 13, 2014 #1 You'd think as much $$$ as they tied up in it. They would have put more leg room!!! SMH
Robo 1971 Castle in the Hub: Your lights are on! Joined Nov 18, 2001 Jun 14, 2014 #2 HWY20RIDE4MYSON said: You'd think as much $$$ as they tied up in it. They would have put more leg room!!! SMH Click to expand... The cars are too small, in-genearal. This is one of the biggest disappointments in basic attraction design.
HWY20RIDE4MYSON said: You'd think as much $$$ as they tied up in it. They would have put more leg room!!! SMH Click to expand... The cars are too small, in-genearal. This is one of the biggest disappointments in basic attraction design.
HWY20RIDE4MYSON Mouseketeer Joined May 20, 2012 Jun 15, 2014 #3 Yes this ride happends to be the worst for lwg room you'd think they would do better on that!!
JACKNAG DIS Veteran Joined Jan 22, 2003 Jun 15, 2014 #4 Does any one think they gave up on leg room to keep the height requirement down for little kids? This will hurt anyone one 6 feet definitely
Does any one think they gave up on leg room to keep the height requirement down for little kids? This will hurt anyone one 6 feet definitely
D dawgrif Mouseketeer Joined Aug 6, 2009 Jun 15, 2014 #5 I'm a big guy, 6'2" and about 275 and I had no issues. It was a little tight but not that bad.
HWY20RIDE4MYSON Mouseketeer Joined May 20, 2012 Jun 17, 2014 #6 Anyone with knee problems will have difficulty with this ride
tebookie WDW FAN Joined May 1, 2001 Jun 17, 2014 #7 Not "Pooh" size friendly either. Should have used the design used in Everest and customized it to 7 Dwarfs ride.
Not "Pooh" size friendly either. Should have used the design used in Everest and customized it to 7 Dwarfs ride.