Guess we have to call it the Grand New Englander now, rather than the Grand Floridian.All in all, I think it is tastefully done. It doesn't affect the sight line and it reminds me of the rocky shores of New England.
Guess we have to call it the Grand New Englander now, rather than the Grand Floridian.All in all, I think it is tastefully done. It doesn't affect the sight line and it reminds me of the rocky shores of New England.
News
Grand Floridian shoreline now has rocks instead of sand.
http://wdwnt.com/blog/2016/07/photos-rocky-shorline-replaces-sand-at-disneys-grand-floridian-resort/
I think E-Ride Nights were $10.99 or something like that. I loved them.
It was a private beach front property where swimming was allowed because my grandfather owned that chunk of breach, and we couldn't wade or walk on the shoreline because it hurt to do so. So yeah, we still went in because that was our beach and our only option.So the rocks alone obviously didn't stop you going in the water. Hence the fence.
Guess we have to call it the Grand New Englander now, rather than the Grand Floridian.
All in all, I think it is tastefully done. It doesn't affect the sight line and it reminds me of the rocky shores of New England.
Guess we have to call it the Grand New Englander now, rather than the Grand Floridian.
[QUOTE="saskdw, post: 56123591, member: 349310] Can't see many people wanting to draw that kind of attention to themselves.
They better be ready to order quite a few of these. The $35 should more than cover the cost if someone doesn't return theirs, but that looks more like a souvenir to some than it does a rental.
Are the rocks and fence permanent?
They started at $12 and I think we're then $14?
Better than the crap they are selling like used cars these days. Simple, effective, inclusive, and profitable enough that they went on as "acceptable" for awhile.
Big shot Bobby can't tolerate that kind of "non-premium" nonsense now though...
But the idea of paying $150 for essentially the same thing I paid $12 for is a tough hurdle to get over.
News
Three more cancelled Disney infinity figures
http://wdwnt.com/blog/2016/07/three-more-cancelled-12-inch-disney-infinity-figures-shown/
No back compatability. The characters from Disney 1.0 and 2.0 could be played on the 3.0 version, but the 3.0 characters could not play on the 2.0 version. It's was the main obnoxious thing about the game - that each version you had to buy a new $70 "base" version. I think because of that, and the fact that the version with the most variety was the FIRST version, it sort of made sales drop off every year, and Disney can't tolerate something that doesn't make a billion dollars.
I liked the game a lot, but the problem is even though we bought all 3 versions, I just never had the free time to get involved with the open source "toy box" and really learn how to build. There was lots of fun stuff in there - and it really is a shame that Disney stopped putting out new sets. There was no reason they couldn't have kept generating new play sets and make them downloadable.
Now I'm kinda glad the whole thing got canned. This kind of double dipping is ridiculous. At worst, they are duplicates of already released characters. At best, any costume changes or the like could have easily been 'power discs', rather than full blown figures.
It looks like Infinity was about to go into full shenanigans mode before it got canceled.
To add on to that...
The 1.0 and 2.0 Play Set Piece (Themed Game) does not work with the 3.0 disc....Nor do the Power Discs.