My biggest beef (pardon the pun), is not so much with the "staples" of nuggets and mac-n-cheese, as I think those can be pretty easily avoided. My DS never ate a single one in each annual trip to WDW from age 9 months to age 14. And it didn't take much planning to avoid them. So I think the focus there is a bit overblown. No. My beef is with the fact that the same children's menu is offered for 4 year olds and 9 year olds. I don't see enough "leveling up" of eating progression on children's menus. I'm not making the "let's see more healthy choices" argument. I'll leave the health debate to others. Instead, I would like to see a mix of "staples" and adult food simply because a typical 9 year old does not eat the same as a 4 year old. And vice versa.
Let's take two restaurants as examples. First comes Tutto Italia. Its kid's menu looks great for a 4 year old. But when my DS was 9, she would have been insulted by the following:
Entrees
Mozzarella Sticks $10
Spaghetti - with meatballs and parmesan $10
Piccolini alla Panna - Farfalle pasta, cream and parmesan cream $10
No veal. No chicken parm or Marsala. No scampi. Transitional foods is what she wanted at that age.
Now let's look at Mr. Paul.
Entrees
Supreme de Poulet roti aux pomme puree et haricot verts
Roasted chicken breast with mashed potatoes and green beans $13.00
Filet mignon et pommes puree, jus naturel
Filet mignon served with mashed potatoes and natural jus $16.00
A home run for the transitional eater, but nothing here for the typical 4 year old. (And spare me the "My snowflake would have loved those two choices when she was 4." Know what? Mine would have too. But that fact doesn't make it the majority rule. I'm trying to fashion an argument here for the masses. Not the lucky few.)
What WDW needs more of is a combination of these types of menus and we would see far more happy diners. Note that there isn't a nugget or burger to be found on either menu, so we can end the debate now that that is the only thing served at WDW. No. This isn't about nuggets and health. It is really about a fair mix of food fit for toddlers and pre-teens. That is where the diversity focus needs to be. And if your 9 year old want to eat like a 4 year old, then he will get that chance. And if your 4 year old wants to eat like a 9 year old. She can too. As long as there is a decent mix of choices. Lacking that, we never got the dining plan since many typical kid's menus were designed for 4 year olds, and unlike Peter Pan, our kids do grow up. It's great to pay a lesser fee for a 9 year old. But not at the expense of having him/her eat like a toddler.
I think there is a decent mix of choices. Just not always at the same restaurant. Each restaurant doesn't need 15 things on their kid's menu. Don't think your kids will eat what is on a certain menu? Don't eat there. Go eat at one of the other 20 restaurants in that park. Lack of options is not an issue.
Know what would happen if they had kitchens full of food choices? You would have a lot of wasted food. And with Disney streamlining their menus, there is no way they are all of a sudden start trying to please every tiny palate. Which would be impossible anyway.
And all of that hassle for someone paying $18 a day for food? That is expecting an awful lot for not much money.
I'm not seeing what is so hard about viewing menus on line, and picking restaurants based on what will or will not be enjoyed. If I don't like the menu, I don't eat someplace. I don't expect them to change the menu to suit me, or to offer all sorts of choices that run the gamut from plain to fancy. That is like saying Monsieur Paul should have french fries and hot dogs, and then progress up to their escargot. I don't get why they have to have food that will make everyone happy. <<<I agree!