Granny
Yeah, I'm a guy
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2001
- Messages
- 14,432
This is inspired by a comment from 3DisneyKids on the AKV point chart thread. It is apparent that AKV will have an end date of 2057 compared to 2054 for SSR and 2042 for all other DVC resorts. This is a departure from how the first the first six DVC resorts were sold from 1992 - 2004 (?) where they all had the same expiration date of 2042.
It appears that Disney will now stagger the expiration dates to approximately 50 years after beginning sales for each new resort? So we'll have multiple resort expiration dates for the various resorts?
Anyone care to venture a guess on why Disney would deviate from it's pattern of selling multiple resorts with a common end date?
I thought DVC II (2054) would cover the AKV and probably the next DVC after that. Clearly Disney has historical records that show that it can sell out resorts even with only as few as 38 years on a new contract (though admittedly that was BCV which has huge demand).
I was just surprised to see the difference. Don't you all agree that it will really undermine closing out SSR sales if a new resort opens with a longer contract period? It would seem that they would have to have a different price structure for each of the two resorts.
I thought it was curious. Anyone else?
It appears that Disney will now stagger the expiration dates to approximately 50 years after beginning sales for each new resort? So we'll have multiple resort expiration dates for the various resorts?
Anyone care to venture a guess on why Disney would deviate from it's pattern of selling multiple resorts with a common end date?
I thought DVC II (2054) would cover the AKV and probably the next DVC after that. Clearly Disney has historical records that show that it can sell out resorts even with only as few as 38 years on a new contract (though admittedly that was BCV which has huge demand).
I was just surprised to see the difference. Don't you all agree that it will really undermine closing out SSR sales if a new resort opens with a longer contract period? It would seem that they would have to have a different price structure for each of the two resorts.
I thought it was curious. Anyone else?