i want to know about this as well
canon but i really am more interested in first hand experience about tokina lenses in general since they seem to get some really nice reviews but i never hear about many who actually have them except in reviews...plus some of the rating ie on fredmiranda are in the 7 range and i don't know if that is brand name bias or if there really is that much of a difference...i was looking at that one then ended up buying a canon 70-200 f4 since the tokina weighed more and i couldn't find out much first hand info about it. but would have loved the f2.8 ..and now am trying to decide between the 12-24 or 10-17 tokina and the 10-22 canon.
Congrats on the new lens, post some pics when you get it...
wow! you might have convinced me to try the tokina 10-17 which i'vs also see good reviews for. unless you want to buy that as well then let us know what you think?![]()
I believe that the Tokina lens that Mickey88 has is a actually a Tokina design, and I know the 10-17mm is a Pentax design, so the quality of one may not be a direct indicator of the quality of the other.wow! you might have convinced me to try the tokina 10-17 which i'vs also see good reviews for. unless you want to buy that as well then let us know what you think?![]()
OT a bit here but don't people who hang flags own an iron?
Mickey, can you share how much this lens cost?
I am still saving my pennies for the Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8, but meanwhile I would like to have a lens for a second body as High School Football is rapidly approaching.